Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Bowl Games (other than ours) and associated silliness 2024 Plus the Playoffs

Robert Sorell said:
Which Bama?

Bama played bad enough to lose to this Indiana team at least 5 times this season.

Bama's ceiling is higher, and the have more NFL talent, but they were not the unequivocally better team this year.
Click to expand...
Eyeball tonight. Retroscope

And advanced data. But losses matter. They didn’t get it done.
 
14er said:
Nervous College Football GIF by Goodyear Cotton Bowl Classic
Click to expand...
Oh I forgot about her. So hot.
 
Darth Snow said:
So why are you talking about them?
Click to expand...
I think Indiana is overmatched, and weaker than Bama and likely other teams. We have moved to a must deserving model especially as the committee grapples with the concept of three loss teams. This will be bounced around with other conceits like the-seeding after the first round as tweaks are made the better the system.
 
hawg1 said:
I think Indiana is overmatched, and weaker than Bama and likely other teams. We have moved to a must deserving model especially as the committee grapples with the concept of three loss teams. This will be bounced around with other conceits like the-seeding after the first round as tweaks are made the better the system.
Click to expand...
No, that's not why you are talking about a team that wasn't good enough. Good try at avoiding the question.
 
Darth Snow said:
Gotcha fan boi. No one cares about the sec crybabies. And you aren't helping the secs case.
Click to expand...
Not crying. Neither deserve to be in. I’m merely making an observation about this Indiana team and how the 12 team playoff is working in year one. No need to make it personal with twisted panties. I’ll go long on this topic if you want.
 
Hank said:
Indiana is not very good. We all knew that. Luckiest schedule ever.

And that was not a catch.
Click to expand...
They really struggled against two too Ds. And again tonight.not surprised, at all. Cig looked rough at 1/2. Panel was trying to be nice.
 
The Alabaster Yak said:
I think Bama would likely beat ASU, Clemson, SMU, PSU, Boise, and Indiana. At some point, these teams gotta win their games to have an argument. 1 loss P4 should always get in over a 3 loss Bama
Click to expand...

With these larger conferences you can't be making blanket statements like this though, just look at Indiana's schedule for this year. Same with Missouri and there's a reason they weren't in the same discussion as Bama/Ole Miss/SCarolina as far as just missing a CFP spot
 
CarolinaBuff said:
With these larger conferences you can't be making blanket statements like this though, just look at Indiana's schedule for this year. Same with Missouri and there's a reason they weren't in the same discussion as Bama/Ole Miss/SCarolina as far as just missing a CFP spot
Click to expand...
In other words, SoS and SoR really matter in these larger conference formats. Committee will reframe how they look at data after this year, I predict.
 
hawg1 said:
Not crying. Neither deserve to be in. I’m merely making an observation about this Indiana team and how the 12 team playoff is working in year one. No need to make it personal with twisted panties. I’ll go long on this topic if you want.
Click to expand...
The topic of Bama being too ****ty for the playoff is dumb so please go on about Bama so we can keep laughing at them and the sec with their 8-game schedule.
 
hawg1 said:
I think Indiana is overmatched, and weaker than Bama and likely other teams. We have moved to a must deserving model especially as the committee grapples with the concept of three loss teams. This will be bounced around with other conceits like the-seeding after the first round as tweaks are made the better the system.
Click to expand...

This year's committee did a terrible job of taking strength of schedule into account and instead just took a 4th-grader mentality and took the P4 teams in order of least amount of losses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top