That is you at 19? I thought it was Kurt Cobain's HS picture....Set my hair on fire? Forget that ****. I'd have to spread napalm on my scalp and set my scalp on fire. The 19 year old DBT to your left is not exactly the 54 year old DBT typing this post. :lol:
Set my hair on fire? Forget that ****. I'd have to spread napalm on my scalp and set my scalp on fire. The 19 year old DBT to your left is not exactly the 54 year old DBT typing this post. :lol:
From his twitter (I hate, twitter FWIW):
http://NOPE/CoachHawk
- Meetings then Practice!!! I'm FIRED UP about starting on the road to winning 10!!! Time to set you hair on fire!!! GO BUFFS!!!12:20 PM Mar 31st from web
10 and nooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! :thumbsup: I wonder which BCS bowl game they'll be in and what their final Top 10 rank will be?
Yeah, I know. I was being facetious. I'll take anything more than 7 wins. 10 would be awesome, but I'd be happy with 8. Although, I think 10 is certainly achievable if progress is really being made, and the staff (Helfrich and Riddle) has improved.
To be fair, winning 10 games doesn't necessarily put the buffs in the top 10 or a bcs game.
Put me in the "I'm elated that we won 10 games category" even if that doesn't get us a BCS win. With our coaches and 10 wins, recruiting will take off.
Me too. 8 wins puts us back in the top 25 in recruiting imo.
Please put a cork in it. We have heard all this a million times, and haven't been a ranked team since 2002. I'd be delirious with 7 - 8 wins.14-0, 14-0, 14-0!!!
That will be our record the next three seasons. No, it's not premature to start talking about a 3-peat national title!:thumbsup:
4 out of 6 heismans coming too!:thumbsup:
Please put a cork in it. We have heard all this a million times, and haven't been a ranked team since 2002. I'd be delirious with 7 - 8 wins.
Yep. I could buy beer with the best of 'em! Well, except for my guilt trip stuff. It was hard to not act nervous. :lol:thats a pretty wicked beard for a 19 year old.
Please put a cork in it. We have heard all this a million times, and haven't been a ranked team since 2002. I'd be delirious with 7 - 8 wins.
The last time we were ranked at the end of the season was 2002. That's all that counts. Hopefully this will change soon.We will win the national title 7 of the next 9 years, bank it! Bet your house on it!:thumbsup:
EDIT: I really hope you don't think I'm serious, but this is serious, we were ranked for several weeks in 2005. So you're wrong on 2002 being the last.
The last time we were ranked at the end of the season was 2002. That's all that counts. Hopefully this will change soon.
My Bad, I don't count rankings till the end of the season. Remember the year we were ranked #1 at the beginning of the season under Neuheisel in 1997 and ended up 5 - 6.well you didn't say that in the post, so excuuuuuuuse me!
CU has 5 teams on it's schedule that were a combined 18-41 (TU, WYO, KSU, ISU, TAM) last year. If they can't squeeze out 6-7 wins and bowl game at a minimum from that lineup then there are serious problems.
Let's just go completely off of last year to predict next years record! Brilliantlammie
Remember the year we were ranked #1 at the beginning of the season under Neuheisel in 1997 and ended up 5 - 6.
CU has 5 teams on it's schedule that were a combined 18-41 (TU, WYO, KSU, ISU, TAM) last year. If they can't squeeze out 6-7 wins and bowl game at a minimum from that lineup then there are serious problems.
Let's just go completely off of last year to predict next years record! Brilliantlammie
CU has 5 teams on it's schedule that were a combined 18-41 (TU, WYO, KSU, ISU, TAM) last year. If they can't squeeze out 6-7 wins and bowl game at a minimum from that lineup then there are serious problems.
I agree completely. The schedule definitely works in CU's favor this year. Three difficult road games, and the rest are imminently winnable. Win one or two of the tough road games and you're sitting at a 10-win season. If the team is starting to finally gel like we're being told, winning in Morgantown and/or Stillwater shouldn't be out of the question.