Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

'18 CA OT Will Craig (Signed to Cal)

WasianCU

WasianCU

Club Member
Club Member
Moderator
247sports
ESPN
Rivals
hudl

item1859819_185px.png

Granite Bay HS (Granite Bay, CA)

Twitter: https://NOPE/will_craig_22

Ht: 6'5"
Wt: 265
40:

247s rating: 4*-91 grade; #18 OT (#245 overall)
ESPN rating: 4*-80 grade; #25 OT
Rivals rating: 4*-5.8rr; #13 OT (#196 overall)

247s Composite: 4* / 0.9037 / #18 OT / #281 overall

Reported Offers: COLORADO, Arizona, Arizona State, California, Nebraska, Nevada, Notre Dame, Oregon, Oregon State, Sacramento State, San Jose State, Syracuse, UCLA, Utah, Washington, Washington State, Yale
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Picked up a UCLA offer this week. With our previous ties to Granite Bay (Dylan Keeney and Isaiah Lewis), think Craig could end up being a priority for the staff.
 
So he visited for the Spring Game and enjoyed it. Guessing he is very high on the board.
 
No science, but, intuitively, I think it is preferable to bring in a lighter kid and add weight than a bigger kid and remove weight. So I like that he's tall (6'-5") and on the light side (265) rather than 300+.
 
DBT said:
No science, but, intuitively, I think it is preferable to bring in a lighter kid and add weight than a bigger kid and remove weight. So I like that he's tall (6'-5") and on the light side (265) rather than 300+.
Click to expand...
That's interesting. I've always assumed the opposite, because of the amount of strength it takes to move around (let alone be athletic) at a larger size. There's also less worry about them not being able to reach an ideal size for their position. That said, this kid definitely looks like he has the frame for it.
 
Trufflesauce said:
That's interesting. I've always assumed the opposite, because of the amount of strength it takes to move around (let alone be athletic) at a larger size. There's also less worry about them not being able to reach an ideal size for their position. That said, this kid definitely looks like he has the frame for it.
Click to expand...
It's different with some people than others. What Dbt says about this guy makes sense. Nice screen name btw lol.
 
Seems like this kid is a very good fit for CU and our coaching staff; both football-wise and character-wise. He will have a tough decision to make.
 
I think that we're pretty much full on OLs.

The only openings are likely "best player regardless of position" type spots. Of the uncommitted OLs that CU has offered, Craig seems to be the only guy who fits this description.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top