I am for conference pride in this case. Already have one PAC-12 win over a MWC school, might as well get another.
Could be a really low scoring game because both teams have mediocre to poor offenses, but good defenses.
Kiesau? I have no idea how they're not good on O. They have Kasen Williams, Austin Sefarian-jenkins, Bishop Sankey, Keith Price etc. They're good at nearly every position (I have no idea about the OL)
Kiesau? I have no idea how they're not good on O. They have Kasen Williams, Austin Sefarian-jenkins, Bishop Sankey, Keith Price etc. They're good at nearly every position (I have no idea about the OL)
Screw BjSU. Don't let the MWC trolls have any more ammo. My wish list is Boise loses and Chris Peterson takes the Oregon job after Chip Kelley leaves for the NFL.
Utah was not a PAC-12 member at the time.
The other two teams they have beaten: ASU in 2011 and Washington this year. Neither finished higher than third in their division.
Well, I guess that makes me feel a little bit better, but not much.
Didn't realize BSU had played (and now beaten) Pac-12 teams in three straight bowl games. Not a good look for the conference.
Keep in mind all three Boise teams finished or will finish the season ranked, including two top 10 finishes. The two true PAC-12 teams were mediocre. Boise gets to benefit from mediocre competition... again.
We do need Washington to sack up and win that game next season though.
the problem for the pac 12 in the vegas bowl is it pits mwc #1 vs in some years pac 12 4,5 or 6. uw was 4th in the pac 12 north behind stanford, oregon, and oregon st. plus one could argue that ucla, az st and usc are better than wash also
No measurement after the 4th down play? Seriously?
Miles and Lindquist both redshirted. They, Derrick Brown and Troy Williams could all compete next year for starter or backup.
I blame the OL for the QB play this year. Zero pass protection.
4/5 end of season OL return, along with hopefully 2 starters who went down in Sept. Still a minimum of two years away from solid OL depth I think.
Huskies will be mediocre until they get more beef...
Keep in mind all three Boise teams finished or will finish the season ranked, including two top 10 finishes. The two true PAC-12 teams were mediocre. Boise gets to benefit from mediocre competition... again.
We do need Washington to sack up and win that game next season though.
That's not necessarily Boise State's fault...it's the Mountain West's top bowl. They want to go to the Big East to maybe play better than "mediocre" competition, and it falls apart - not their fault.
Mind you, they scheduled games against Oregon, Virginia Tech, Georgia and Michigan State the past four seasons. Won the first three. Those teams wound up in the Rose, Orange and Outback Bowls those respective seasons - and Boise State beat all three.
I'm a CU grad, and yes I live in Boise, but it's pretty silly to just dismiss them because of their schedule. What the hell do they need to do to prove they can compete against anyone? They can't just jump into the Pac-12, and you can't seriously expect them to schedule four SEC teams in nonconference, can you?
They do?How about start the season against four BCS teams. Every other BCS team plays four in a row.
I know was joking around. I'd like to see them in a legit league myself. I don't think they'd win one but I think they'd hold their own.