What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Buffs of the Decade

Always BUFF

I post stupid ****
I sat down today reviewing the decade's players that I enjoyed watching most by their position. Starting with WR, there was a time when we didn't have any early on. My top 5 WRs
1) Paul Richardson - Best deep threat since Cliff Branch
2) Nelson Spruce - Soft hands and knew where the yard marker was
3) Laviska Shenault - Since Michael Westbrook the most physical Buff at the position.
4) Scotty McKnight - The king of the 7 yd ball
5) Jay Mac - Never dropped a catchable ball and each reception moved the chains.
 
I sat down today reviewing the decade's players that I enjoyed watching most by their position. Starting with WR, there was a time when we didn't have any early on. My top 5 WRs
1) Paul Richardson - Best deep threat since Cliff Branch
2) Nelson Spruce - Soft hands and knew where the yard marker was
3) Laviska Shenault - Since Michael Westbrook the most physical Buff at the position.
4) Scotty McKnight - The king of the 7 yd ball
5) Jay Mac - Never dropped a catchable ball and each reception moved the chains.
Jay Mac doesn't belong anywhere near this list.
 
This is actually interesting to think about, especially when you look at the stats. I know we all love Viska because he just finished up, BUT...

P Rich's best year, he had 83 catches for 1343 yards and 10 TDs. In his three years playing he averaged 52 catches 804 yards and 7 TDs.
Spruce's best year, he had 106 catches for 1198 yards and 12 TDs. In his four years playing he averaged 74 catches 837 yards and 6 TDs.
Viska's best year, he had 86 catches for 1011 yards and 6 TDs. In his three years playing he averaged 50 catches for 648 yards and 3 TDs.
Viska including rushing would have been at 64 catches/runs for 741 yards and 6 TD's

Each of these players had defenses focusing on stopping them. Spruce never had anyone else the defenses focused on too much because P Rich was young and out for one of those years. P. Rich did have Spruce distracting defenses and he didn't kill it when he did have that help (not enough footballs to go around in a bad offense?). Viska definitely had other people the defense had to pay some attention to even while primarily focused on Viska In P Rich's and Spruce's case the defenses had zero success slowing them down. In Viska's case, the defenses may have had some success, but it is hard to tell because of his injuries.

When factoring in the run Viska is comparable with P. Rich and Spruce from a stats perspective, but they were still better. When thinking of speed P Rich and Viska stand out. When you think of physical domination, Viska stands alone.

I loved watching them all, but maybe because I still can't figure out exactly how Spruce did it, I think I liked watching him best. I mean he wasn't burner, he wasn't explosive, he certainly wasn't physically imposing but he killed people anyway....HOW? No, really, HOW?? He never seemed to take plays off either.

Viska was probably the second most fun for me to watch, because of his ability to destroy guys and make it look like he was a pro playing against pee wee players. However, there were times I was really frustrated with him too...where he clearly didn't go 100% or would be out of games when CU needed him. This was frustrating but I have chalked it up to his injuries.

P Rich's last season was crazy fun to watch. Everyone knew the only place CU could throw the ball was to P Rich...and it worked anyway. Different beast than the other two, but fun to watch.
 
This is actually interesting to think about, especially when you look at the stats. I know we all love Viska because he just finished up, BUT...

P Rich's best year, he had 83 catches for 1343 yards and 10 TDs. In his three years playing he averaged 52 catches 804 yards and 7 TDs.
Spruce's best year, he had 106 catches for 1198 yards and 12 TDs. In his four years playing he averaged 74 catches 837 yards and 6 TDs.
Viska's best year, he had 86 catches for 1011 yards and 6 TDs. In his three years playing he averaged 50 catches for 648 yards and 3 TDs.
Viska including rushing would have been at 64 catches/runs for 741 yards and 6 TD's

Each of these players had defenses focusing on stopping them. Spruce never had anyone else the defenses focused on too much because P Rich was young and out for one of those years. P. Rich did have Spruce distracting defenses and he didn't kill it when he did have that help (not enough footballs to go around in a bad offense?). Viska definitely had other people the defense had to pay some attention to even while primarily focused on Viska In P Rich's and Spruce's case the defenses had zero success slowing them down. In Viska's case, the defenses may have had some success, but it is hard to tell because of his injuries.

When factoring in the run Viska is comparable with P. Rich and Spruce from a stats perspective, but they were still better. When thinking of speed P Rich and Viska stand out. When you think of physical domination, Viska stands alone.

I loved watching them all, but maybe because I still can't figure out exactly how Spruce did it, I think I liked watching him best. I mean he wasn't burner, he wasn't explosive, he certainly wasn't physically imposing but he killed people anyway....HOW? No, really, HOW?? He never seemed to take plays off either.

Viska was probably the second most fun for me to watch, because of his ability to destroy guys and make it look like he was a pro playing against pee wee players. However, there were times I was really frustrated with him too...where he clearly didn't go 100% or would be out of games when CU needed him. This was frustrating but I have chalked it up to his injuries.

P Rich's last season was crazy fun to watch. Everyone knew the only place CU could throw the ball was to P Rich...and it worked anyway. Different beast than the other two, but fun to watch.
This should tell you all you need to know about Montez.
 
PRich was a stud for CU...the opposition had to keep an eye on Toney Clemons which helped a bit...but the buffs had no TE and a very young backfield..making Prich's performance even more impressive
 
Back
Top