With all due respect, I disagree with you guys and am going to derail this thread. I think we all acknowledge that MJ is a top-flight prick of a competitor and prickly as a person, but I don't think we can just label MJ as uncoachable.
Man, I'm not so sure about that. He was notorious for cussing them out. Even Smith he had run ins with while playing for him - though nothing like the levels of his clashes with the others. Hell, I'm pretty sure Jordan was at least rumored to be behind the firing of Collins in Chicago.
Yeah, but Dean Smith has also been quoted as saying MJ was coachable - had to look it up, but he said, "He'd listen closely to what the coaches said and then go do it." Sure, I have no doubt that MJ was difficult to coach at times, but I don't think that means he was uncoachable. Phil in his memoir called out Kobe, but he didn't say anything about MJ being close to uncoachable. It's sort of a self-serving statement, but MJ also considers one of his best traits to having been coachable.
As for Collins - I again was too young to really remember, but I was surprised to see you wrote that. I remember him and Doug seemed tight in clips from back in the day, and MJ hired Collins to HC the Wizards. Doing some basic online research, it seems that Collins was more fired for his feud with Krause. I don't remember where I heard/read it, but I thought Krause firing Collins actually was one of the many things MJ couldn't stand about Krause (could be a false memory/news). There's an archived article from the Chicago Tribune that mentions that MJ was actually worried that people would think he got Collins fired like Magic and Westhead. If you truly believe that MJ was uncoachable, then all of this may be construed as general PR glossing, but I personally feel MJ was a coachable player. His immersion into the triangle, ultimate acceptance of Kukoc (who he and Pippen initially hated the idea of), Phil's not talking negative of MJ at all in his tell-all, and the mutual love/respect him and Dean had make me believe this.
Yep. MJ was everything a coach could want in terms of being the hardest working player, holding others accountable, etc. But he was also so strong willed that it was a borderline psychosis. Anything a HC of his teams wanted to do, that HC had to make sure there was buy-in from MJ before presenting it to the team. Because if MJ went against it it wasn't gonna happen.
And in terms of GMs and team executives, MJ was notorious for snubbing them in public and in front of the team (that is, when he wasn't loudly insulting and ridiculing them).
Sure, he and Krause did not see eye to eye, but Krause still ran the show as the GM. Krause said something to the effect of MJ never once came to him asking for help or requesting a specific player. Now...that doesn't seem to be true, but there's probably some semblance of truth behind Krause's statement.
Where are you getting that Phil needed buy-in from MJ??? If you're talking about his days with the Wizards...that's an awkward situation and story, so even if it happened in Washington, I don't think that's how MJ was with his coaches during his real playing days. I don't think Dean had to do this, so you must be talking of Phil... ...Phil and Tex instituted the triangle... ...I haven't read Phil's book, but from all the quotes and reviews, this was never mentioned in anything I saw.
Yep.
He was also not an easy teammate. He expected your best every moment, whether it be practice or a game. He would chew anyone's ass he didn't feel was giving it all. Jordan may have been the only one Rodman respected enough to give more than marginal effort most of the time.
Sure, he was not an easy teammate, but again, that doesn't mean he wasn't uncoachable. As for Rodman... ...sure, he started to change a lot in his later Pistons years and with the Spurs, but I don't think marginal effort and Rodman are really synonymous. In fact, I'd say they're rather antonyms. Rodman may have seemed disinterested on offense at times, but he was all effort.