College Football Zealots - Pac-12 Preview

[dio]

Uhhh - you guys aren't going to like the Colorado section.

http://www.collegefootballzealots.com/2011-articles/august/2011-pac-12-preview.html

I'm ok with negative predictions for us, but I think a lot of the negative predictions are simply based around a lack of knowledge regarding the Buffs. I still think we beat out UA and UCLA

 

[Quattro]

This was a solid one, rest sucked.

Kevin (Prediction: #5 Pac-12 South): I'm a little higher than the rest of the guys on the Buffaloes. Maybe it's because they beat my Dawgs last year (even though we had a chip shot FG set up for the win when the frackin OL forgot to block their DL and Caleb King got blown up at hand-off and fumbled the game away). I think Colorado will be able to find some games where they can run the ball down certain teams throats. The Pac-12 isn't big on DL strength and I think Colorado can use that to their advantage if they are smart. They have an experienced OL and a really good RB. They key for Colorado will be to stay away from shootouts and control the pigskin. If they can do that then they might surprise some. Until then, they are my pick for fifth in the South.

This is just...well a pissed off UCLA clown....
[hide]

Jay (Prediction: #6 Pac-12 South): Just awful. They should just give up on football all together. It's fairly obvious to everybody else that they don't really care about it in Boulder. They followed up one of the worst hires of the last five years with what I'm sure we'll be calling "one of the worst hires of the last five years" in 2016. Last year, they flirted with a bowl game. This year, they won't even come close. I think I'm done talking about Colorado football until they get serious over there.

[/hide]

 

[Burrito]

Niedermier, dead...

 

[BuffNut99]

Niedermier, dead...

What comes around...

 

[Buffnik]

Niedermier, dead...

I thought he was the governor of Texas?

 

[Burrito]

I thought he was the governor of Texas?

It was more about the sentiment.

 

[dply]

This is just...well a pissed off UCLA clown....

Who the **** is UCLA? If there is anyone in the Pac that shouldn't be talking **** it's UCLA.

 

[Quattro]

Who the **** is UCLA? If there is anyone in the Pac that shouldn't be talking **** it's UCLA.

Why the **** not? Slick Rick is there and that just gives more reason to talk **** and they're one of the few teams we had a better record against last year.

 

[Heywood]

rep to you both nik and nut!!

 

[dply]

Why the **** not? Slick Rick is there and that just gives more reason to talk **** and they're one of the few teams we had a better record against last year.

I was saying they have no room to talk smack. Not that we can't. :lol:

 

[Quattro]

I was saying they have no room to talk smack. Not that we can't. :lol:

Wow I read that wrong the first time badly.