What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Colorado football year 2 "Progression"

absinthe

Ambitious but rubbish.
Club Member
Junta Member
Typically the second year of any coaching staff yields the biggest change in performance over the previous year. At this point players have 2 full years of practice and a season of live action under their belts in the new system. The team is typically made up of 50% of the "new guy's" players and many of the kinks are worked out. We've seen some progression in the return game and O'niel is having a better season, other than that it is not good, here are the numbers and just the numbers:

Jon Embree 2011 Vs Jon Embree 2012:

Category2012 Rank2011 Rank"progression"
Rushing Offense109105worse
Passing Offense9956worse
Total Offense11896worse
Scoring Offense120109worse
Rush defense11697worse
Pass Efficiency Defense120114worse
Total Defense118104worse
Scoring Defense120117worse
Turnover Margin11480worse
Pass Defense10697worse
Passing Efficiency11682worse
Sacks8047worse
SacksAllowed11991worse

We are worse in almost every major statistical category.
 
Good formatting and chart-work. Thanks. Much appreciated, sad as it is. When I saw how many points we allowed last year to this, and that we're giving up a lot more, plus that we're scoring far fewer points, I was embarrassed for Embree. Thru 11 games, there's a 110-point differential between those totals from last year to this season. "In every phase, going backwards and getting worse."
 
Good formatting and chart-work. Thanks. Much appreciated, sad as it is. When I saw how many points we allowed last year to this, and that we're giving up a lot more, plus that we're scoring far fewer points, I was embarrassed for Embree. Thru 11 games, there's a 110-point differential between those totals from last year to this season. "In every phase, going backwards and getting worse."

We had a much tougher schedule last year, too.
 
Penalties are also another great measurement of the staff, at the beginning of year two in a system the players should better understand where they need to be, their assignments, and after playing for a lame duck coach should be more invested with a new staff. This along with the renewed energy and attention brought to practice should result in a decrease in pnealties year over year, here is what we are seeing through 10 games this year:

10 games in 2011
PENALTIES/YARDS .......................................... 64/598
Offensive .................................................. 31/238
Defensive ................................................. 15/187
Special Teams ......................................... 16/143
Bench/Fans/NCAA Unsportsmanlike .... 2/30

13 games in 2011

PENALTIES/YARDS .......................................... 103/866
Offensive .................................................. 60/411
Defensive ................................................. 28/326
Special Teams ......................................... 14/114
Bench/Fans/NCAA Unsportsmanlike .... 1/15

Now this is not a particularly fair comparison as we are looking at totals for a 13 game season last year vs a total of 10 (reported) games so far this season. So how do we reconcile this? I went with simple math and applied at 10/13 ratio to the penalties. After doing that we show a marginal improvement in total penalties taken (76 vs 64) Yards (665 vs 598) and show some improvement on the offensive and defensive sides of the ball. However Special teams have been truly terrible racking up and adjusted 50% more penalties.

All in all here the penalties are about a wash with small improvements in some area's and regressions in others. This is probably the biggest thing the staff could hang its hat on, "hey we didnt get worse." That said this is an area we would have expected to see significant progress and have not.
 
"Penalties" is a completely useless stat, abs. Thanks for the work on breaking this down, but it means nothing to me.

Programs in the bottom 20 in the nation in penalties per game:

TCU
Texas Tech
Fresno State
LSU
Bowling Green
Florida
Syracuse
Washington
Oregon
Rutgers
LA Tech
USC
UCLA

All of those teams have winning records and some are among the best teams in the nation.

That said, I think it's a good thing that the offense has cut down on false starts this season.
 
I am just fishing for numbers to look at and penalties is not a great one - but there is no real other way to convey that your OC cant get a play in on time than penalties. Also you have the issue of penalties of aggression vs penalties that are coaching issues.

That said i do think there is some value in looking at it, and was actually surprised we arent worse when you have EB on national TV admitting he cant get plays in.
 
Last three years:

2010:
Wins5
Losses7
Season Points Scored290
Season Points Allowed369
Average CU Points24.2
Average Opponent Points30.8
Average Margin-6.6

2011:
Wins3
Losses10
Season Points Scored257
Season Points Allowed475
Average CU Points19.8
Average Opponent Points36.5
Average Margin-16.8

2012:
Wins1
Losses10
Season Points Scored179
Season Points Allowed510
Average CU Points16.3
Average Opponent Points46.4
Average Margin -30.1


 
Back
Top