ESPN sucks.Man, not a single game on ESPN / ABC this year outside the CSU game, kind of a bummer.
Man, not a single game on ESPN / ABC this year outside the CSU game, kind of a bummer.
2 games on the national Fox channel, with one being in prime time on the East Coast, make up for that. These are our first appearances on one of the big 4 stations since 2009.
Well ... at least it's not a 7pm or 8pm start. Let's just hope for the fans' sake it's unseasonably mild that night.
Early forecast is high of 58 with no chance of precipitation.
It's been unseasonably ****ing mild since September. It's getting old.
Speak for yourself! I hope it stays 60-70 till next may
If both Utah and CU lose this weekend and USC wins I think.Is there any way it's not for the Pac 12 South title?
Yes. If we lose this week it's pretty much between Utah and USCIs there any way it's not for the Pac 12 South title?
If both Utah and CU lose this weekend and USC wins I think.
Instead of CFP scenarios, someone should be putting all the possible Pac 12 South scenarios together. So losing this week basically eliminates CU from P12 contention?Yes. If we lose this week it's pretty much between Utah and USC
You won't be saying that when there is no water next summer.
I believe if USC loses we buy ourselves another week regardless of what Utah does.Instead of CFP scenarios, someone should be putting all the possible Pac 12 South scenarios together. So losing this week basically eliminates CU from P12 contention?
I hid it in an obscure thread, but see my post here:Is there any way it's not for the Pac 12 South title?
The scenarios are hopefully now simple enough for Brady Quinn to understand them:
- CU wins out: CU wins the South (USC and Utah irrelevant)
- CU loses to WSU but beats Utah
- AND USC loses to UCLA: CU wins the South (CU 7-2 in P12 play, USC 6-3, Utah v. Oregon irrelevant)
- AND USC beats UCLA: USC wins the South (CU and USC both 7-2, USC has H2H tiebreaker, Utah v. Oregon irrelevant)
- CU beats WSU but loses to Utah
- AND Utah loses to Oregon:
- AND USC loses to UCLA: CU wins the South (CU 7-2 in P12 play, USC and Utah 6-3)
- AND USC beats UCLA: USC wins the South (CU and USC both 7-2, USC has H2H tiebreaker)
- AND Utah beats Oregon:
- AND USC loses to UCLA: Utah wins the South (CU and Utah both 7-2, Utah has H2H tiebreaker)
- AND USC beats UCLA: Utah wins the South (CU, Utah, and USC all 7-2, Utah has H2H victories against both)
- CU loses to both WSU and Utah
- AND Utah beats Oregon: Utah wins the South (USC v. UCLA irrelevant)
- AND Utah loses to Oregon:
- AND USC beats UCLA: USC wins the south (USC 7-2 in P12 play, CU and Utah 6-3)
- AND USC loses to UCLA: Utah wins the south (CU, Utah, and USC all 6-3, Utah has H2H victories against both)
Multiple-team ties If three or more teams are tied atop a division at the end of the season, the following criteria are used to eliminate teams until just two teams remain, at which point the two-team tiebreaking procedure is used.
- Head-to-head results (best record in games between tied teams)
- Record in intra-divisional games
- Record against the next highest placed team in the division (based on the record in all conference games), proceeding through the division
- Record in common conference games
- Highest ranking in SportSource Analytics poll entering the final weekend of the regular season
You won't be saying that when there is no water next summer.
I hid it in an obscure thread, but see my post here:
It will have SOME implication for the P12 South title, but it's not a winner-take-all if CU doesn't beat WSU or if Utah doesn't beat Oregon. If those two things happen, or if CU beats WSU, Utah loses to Oregon, and USC loses to UCLA, it's winner-take-all.