CUBuffs
New Member
memmert@ncaa.org
I know it more than likely won't do anything, but it's good to be heard.
College football has officially become a corrupt system and yesterday's Auburn ruling proved it. The NCAA said their FINDINGS did not meet a BURDEN OF PROOF. This is merely selective enforcement as the NCAA has never needed proof, all they needed was a "feeling". They've hammered so many programs based on someone's word with no substantial proof that I wish these teams could file a joint-suit against the NCAA.
I read on other forums where this isn't the first time an Auburn program has skated on serious violations and it made me sick to my core. But let a team like us help a player's grandmother cross the street with no proof and they'll level us with sanctions.
I just don't understand it. With two Pac-12 teams under NCAA scrutiny, we should all email Emmert and give him an ear full. It's unfair that an $EC team gets off the hook, all because their lawyers dared them to do anything with no proof, yet in the USC case, they'll take a convicted felon's word as proof.
I know it more than likely won't do anything, but it's good to be heard.
College football has officially become a corrupt system and yesterday's Auburn ruling proved it. The NCAA said their FINDINGS did not meet a BURDEN OF PROOF. This is merely selective enforcement as the NCAA has never needed proof, all they needed was a "feeling". They've hammered so many programs based on someone's word with no substantial proof that I wish these teams could file a joint-suit against the NCAA.
I read on other forums where this isn't the first time an Auburn program has skated on serious violations and it made me sick to my core. But let a team like us help a player's grandmother cross the street with no proof and they'll level us with sanctions.
I just don't understand it. With two Pac-12 teams under NCAA scrutiny, we should all email Emmert and give him an ear full. It's unfair that an $EC team gets off the hook, all because their lawyers dared them to do anything with no proof, yet in the USC case, they'll take a convicted felon's word as proof.
