Boulder. Feb 22nd per Chris Fowler
Wow - a string of losses has certainly dampened the moods around here. This is still a BIG DEAL even without Spencer. Great exposure for CU, great exposure for CUnit & a chance for the underdogs to knock-off the #1 team in the country on national television.
Plus, it'll be my first game this season so I'm thrilled!
Indeed, but ultimately, I'm happy it's coming to CU. It wasn't too long ago, you would've been absolutely laughed at if you even made this suggestion. Now it's up to the students/fans to show that ESPN made the right choice. ESPN did their part, now it's our turn!Bittersweet.
Snow said:Whoever made this thread about low attendance should be put on timeout for a week.
Two points:
Regarding the hijack about attendance: I think it sucks that in 2014 we still don't have nationwide standard reporting guidelines for attendance (does the school report "butts in seats" or "tickets sold"?). It would have to mandated by the conferences or the NCAA, but it would be so nice if schools were required to publish the actual "butts in the seats" number. Publishing the "tickets sold" number as 'attendance' is just plain wrong -- "tickets sold" might be an interesting number also, but label it correctly! damn it!
The NCAA does publish attendance-reporting guidelines, but they basically say that schools can use whatever methodology they deem appropriate, whether it be the number of people actually there, the number of tickets sold, or the very vague "estimate"
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/ForSIDs/Policies.pdf
Nobody with a reasonable interpretation of the English language would consider tickets sold to be synonymous.
The NCAA does publish attendance-reporting guidelines, but they basically say that schools can use whatever methodology they deem appropriate, whether it be the number of people actually there, the number of tickets sold, or the very vague "estimate"
In the sports business world, they can be synonymous...