I agree it is not likely but I do believe in the concept of BHAGs (big hair audacious goals) b/c it sets a stretch goal for everyone. Players, coaches, fans, recruits and donors. He is saying we are aiming very high and we should.I say no ****ing way this happens.
Just sets the coach up for failure, IMO.
If this team is 6-6 and going to a bowl game by 2016, fans should be thrilled.
holy god, we've fallen and we can't get up.
holy god, we've fallen and we can't get up.
thrilled with .500 and the weedwacker bowl...
that used to be a hugely disappointing season for us.
not saying you are wrong, but i hate setting expectations this low.
Did you guys honestly expect the AD to keep putting out mediocre goals like they have done in the past?
Did you guys honestly expect the AD to keep putting out mediocre goals like they have done in the past?
Did you guys honestly expect the AD to keep putting out mediocre goals like they have done in the past?
That's why he invented that Russian Elevator thing, amirite?Dick Tharp had lofty goals.
"Hey, we need your money... just don't expect many wins until 2018 or us to finish above 10th in recruiting either. Thanks for your support!"
No. I don't. I don't think any of the other goals are unreasonable. I wouldn't change a thing about them. It's a fine line, to be sure. I don't think I'd be quite so specific about the goals for the football team at this juncture, though. It sounds an awful lot like "10 wins, no excuses". It may be splitting hairs, but I would have preferred he word it a little more softly. Something like "contending for a spot in the CCG by 2016". I know that takes a lot of the teeth out of the goals, but it also doesn't put him in a position to have to make a change if we're showing real improvement, but not actually playing in the CCG in 2016.
Who says he has to make a change though? Most reasonable fans are going to understand why MacIntyre would be staying beyond 2016, provided there is clear, discernable progress.
Who says he has to make a change though? Most reasonable fans are going to understand why MacIntyre would be staying beyond 2016, provided there is clear, discernable progress.
While the buck stops with the head coach, this goal may pressure changes to other staff members if it isn't met.
Why put a specific timetable on it? Why 2016?
Why not come out and say, "We expect all of our athletic programs to compete for the Pac-12 championship every year"?
To me- this is putting a fork in Mike MacIntyre before he's even had a chance to show what he can do. Like sacky said - if the Buffs aren't in the conference championship game by 2016, RG's comments are going to bring out all the people who never wanted MacIntyre in the first place (AZ and his ilk - including some on this board) and they are going to start demanding changes, even if there is progress.