Supposedly the game on Monday set a new ratings record for a show on cable.
If they didn't wait six weeks to play it? The delay has a huge impact on the quality of the game, I think. Also makes it anticlimactic and somewhat boring. Not to mention it's a stupid Monday night game.
3 weeks should be the max. It seems Offenses really lose timing over the longer period and Defense really has the advantage. I know NU always talked about that when they ran option and how the layoff affected them until they stopped letting kids leave for break and kept practicing.
You kind of heard the same stuff from the B10 when OSU made the Title game and their last game was November since there was no Title game. That is a huge layoff.
All Bowls should be fit into a 3 week window.
Of course, the obvious solution is a playoff beginning two weeks after the regular season with the championship game being one of the big 4 bowl games. The remaining bowl structure for teams not in the playoff can just remain status quo.
Interesting stuff, Scotty. We're witnessing such a monumental shift in media right now. I can't help but think that the sports, conferences and programs that get it right can make major moves. On that note, I'm feeling really good about the Pac-12, not so great about the NCAA, pretty discouraged on Plati, and undecided on Bohn.
Why are you discouraged by Plati?
Just a hunch, but it might have something to do with Plati's head-in-the-sand approach to new media. We're going to need people who not only accept new media, but embrace it and use it to their advantage.
If they didn't wait six weeks to play it? The delay has a huge impact on the quality of the game, I think. Also makes it anticlimactic and somewhat boring. Not to mention it's a stupid Monday night game.
Just a hunch, but it might have something to do with Plati's head-in-the-sand approach to new media. We're going to need people who not only accept new media, but embrace it and use it to their advantage.
they need to throw him in a broom closet and let him crunch stats...let somebody else be the SID
Personally I think Plati gets a bad rap in this area. Most of the reputation in this area has to do with the media credentials battle with Ted Smith at netbuffs about 10 years ago. That argument had little to do with the new media and had more to do with what qualifies as legitimate media. CU has embraced the Internet...they have the online broadcast, they have hired B.G. Brooks to write articles on cubuffs.com and Plati writes Platitudes periodically.
Of course I like Plati so I am biased. He is one of the good guys in my book.
Do you see the theme here? New media is inclusive and has content that is created by all kinds of sources, open discussion, things going viral, etc. The three things you pointed out were examples of Plati thinking that the way to capitalize on new media is to figure out a way for the AD (specifically the SID) to completely control it as it relates to CU athletics. That's a pretty screwed up strategy that shows a complete unwillingness to embrace things as they are.
BlackNGold - here's an example for you that hits pretty close to home.
I'm sure you would agree that AllBuffs goes out of its way to be a friend of the CU programs. We hype events, we encourage donations, we try to keep the tone positive, etc., etc.
Do you think that the hundreds of visitors who come to this site every day would like to see AllBuffs start interviewing different coaches, administrators or players? Do you think that would be a positive thing if we submitted questions, got answers, and published them for the readers here?
Guess what. We can't do that because Plati is the gatekeeper for those interviews and the only way we can get these types of interviews is if we have a press credential. And the only way we can get a press credential is if we require every AllBuffs member and registered user to make his/her real name public in his/her profile. My understanding is that the only college or university that has a similarly draconian policy is BYU.