AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
I believe in #MarchTadness
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
It's fun. Love march
L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
So much fun! Who is your Taddy!
wyobuff
Well-Known Member
Dont wanna be that guy, but toss out 2012 and we are 4-2. (3-2 before tonight)
4-2 is still really good, though. I'll take winning 2/3 of conference games on a neutral court with the pressure on -- which maintains as a percentage with the 2-1 in the 2011 Big 12 tourney. (And 2012 counts the same way that busting a 99 yard run is inseparable from a guy's yards-per-carry.)
I'll take the record, thanks
Oregon win, if it can be achieved, could salvage much of this season. Not all, but a whole bunch. It's big from where this team bottomed out, which appears to be AZ game. (Due respect to injury and "stubbed chemistry")
Just find a way.... Build unity back up.
Big win today no doubt. Likey
Just find a way.... Build unity back up.
Big win today no doubt. Likey
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
I'd love him more if we stop playing first round games :lol:
I'm with you. I also think we can blame injuries last year and this year for a lot of why the Buffs didn't have 1st round byes. :lol:
wyobuff
Well-Known Member
An article on why tad is still good for the program. With the recent success, People seem to expect more from the program (good) but have forgotten where we were in 07, 08.
http://milehighsports.com/2015/03/10/bad-season-a-good-sign-for-the-buffs/
TL;DR the buffs used to ****ing suck at bball 85% of the time.
http://milehighsports.com/2015/03/10/bad-season-a-good-sign-for-the-buffs/
TL;DR the buffs used to ****ing suck at bball 85% of the time.
A long history or having an excellent player, winning a bit while he's a Buff, and then sucking again until the next guy comes along.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
CBI?
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Well to answer my question. Sounds like no, at least by how Tad was talking post game.
aghcsm
Well-Known Member
Really, the chance to get to .500 makes it worthwhile. Telling a recruit "we've never had a losing record since I've been head coach" might be helpful in some cases. And even using it to work on weaknesses could help, can't get the same opportunity in practice scrimmage.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Think some extra games while healthy would really do us some good, especially as we're not exactly loaded with seniors. Wonder if we're just not interested or what the deal is. If the bar is higher this season for whatever reason and we just can't get in on account of our record, so be it, but I'd be disappointed if we turned down the opportunity.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
And if we won it we'd hit 20 wins :thumbsup:
aghcsm
Well-Known Member
Yes that too. I understand everyone was expecting more, it's been a long frustrating season and seems time to take a break, but if a few more games are offered there are a lot of positives. Maybe tomorrow the thinking by CU will be different.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Hope so, but this quote makes it seem pretty set. Maybe we're open to it but Tad doesn't see much chance. Maybe we don't want to pay for home games and don't want to go visiting god knows where on the road (if that's how the CBI still does things). With the CBI, I'm not sure how much of it is really "selecting" as opposed to just showing interest if you're a major conference program. Who knows.
J-R-K
Well-Known Member
This highlights another Tad Boyle stat: the fact that we still haven't finished in the top-4 of conference standings (and thus haven't got first round byes). And it's not like the Pac-12 has been particularly strong since we joined. Bonus Tad stat #1: Every single current coach in the Pac-12 and Big-12 except for Krystkowiak has won more NCAA tournament games in their careers then Tad, and Krystkowiak will have passed him by this time next week. Bonus Tad stat #2: CU finished with the worst record this season of the 50-plus teams who received votes to be ranked prior to the season.
NBDefektor
Well-Known Member
Dude, you're not following the script! You can't question tad Boyle on this site! Just be thankful he continues to stick around and not bolt for Kansas yet!
It's not just this site, here's a camera letter to the editor with some great points.
http://www.dailycamera.com/letters/ci_27698208/douglas-s-looney-truth-is-good
Of those 7, Patton won 6 of them(Bzz with the other). He got 1 first round bye as well.
Quit being stupid
hmmmmmmm
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
I don't think its a record thing with them-They struggle to get P5 teams because you're looking at 200k plus to host up to five games. Seems to me that a lot of teams who would be in consideration for this thing have their minds made up ahead of time. I don't think the Camera says "We're likely to take a CBI invite" if that isn't the case-I think this comes down to who they can get to play.