So the ncaa says no proof, but they suspend him anyways? WTF
I was confused on that too. Did A&M suspend him?
title:12.5.2.2 - use of a student-athlete's name or picture without knowledge or permission. if a student-athlete's name or picture appears on commercial items (e.g., t-shirts, sweatshirts, serving trays, playing cards, posters) or is used to promote a commercial product sold by an individual or agency without the student-athlete's knowledge or permission, the student-athlete (or the institution acting on behalf of the student-athlete) is required to take steps to stop such an activity in order to retain his or her eligibility for intercollegiate athletics. Such steps are not required in cases in which a student-athlete's photograph is sold by an individual or agency (e.g., private photographer, news agency) for private use. (revised: 1/11/97, 5/12/05)
They came to an agreement apparently. The NCAA acknowledges that he didn't accept money. W...T...F
A thought just occurred to me... On ESPN commercials they will say "Can the Oklahoma Sooners stop the amazing Johnny Manziel", isn't that selling Manziels name for viewership?
A thought just occurred to me... On ESPN commercials they will say "Can the Oklahoma Sooners stop the amazing Johnny Manziel", isn't that selling Manziels name for viewership?
ATM lawyers at work. Suppress the brokers with a threat.
http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/colleges/tamu/post/_/id/9451/am-could-sue-manziel-autograph-brokers
Good thing we banned Jeremy Bloom from football for accepting sponsorship money in an unrelated sport.
Prolly notThat's allsome. I wonder if I can sue my car manufacturer next time I get a speeding ticket. They were responsible for building an engine that makes the car break the law.
Effectively they did. They gave him a choice, which wasn't really much of a choice. Turns out he would have been better off doing whatever he wanted to, and putting the earnings into a trust so he cold claim he wasn't receiving any benefit.Nobody banned Jeremy Bloom.