LOL at Harrison over Scott
You're right I didn't include Boyce as by his senior year he had kind of maxed out (Thus the lack of an NBA career). I would say Burks was better than Boyce and that his pro career is proving this out. I think Dinwiddie and Boyce would be an interesting discussion. Best thing about lists is that we all will likely have different opinions and bring up good arguments for or against players.Donnie Boyce was the second best ever to play at CU in my time ... he is missing from the list
Best player at CU not best pro prospectHarrison was rated significantly higher coming out of college than Scott is. There is a reason for that. Physically he was more imposing and had more upside than Scott does. Mind you he definitely had some issues with where his head was and he certainly didn't have the outside game Scott has. That being said, Harrison played with only one other borderline NBA caliber player and CU still managed an NCAA Tournament while he was playing. Scott has played with several other borderline NBA talents. Also, it wasn't till pro teams realized Harrison was a headcase that he slipped to the end of the first round. Scott isn't being projected in the first at all. So until Scott does something at the pro level (and I think he will) he can't really be bumped ahead of Harrison.
You're right I didn't include Boyce as by his senior year he had kind of maxed out (Thus the lack of an NBA career). I would say Burks was better than Boyce and that his pro career is proving this out. I think Dinwiddie and Boyce would be an interesting discussion. Best thing about lists is that we all will likely have different opinions and bring up good arguments for or against players.
I actually remember Boyce pretty well despite my obvious age. I thought he was going to be beyond special after his soph year. That year I wished he would take it to the hoop more. He finally did his senior year but his numbers dropped (19.1 soph, 22.4 jr, 18.9 sr). I think the primary reason for his senior decline is he tried to be a more well rounded player and not be a pure two guard. He could shoot the ball lights out and could take a game over if he was hot. Chauncey did that, hot or cold, Burks did that hot or cold (usually cold...in fact I don't think Burks was a very good shooter, no idea if stats support that though), even Dinwiddie took over games in ways other than scoring. Boyce was a scorer. I don't think that made him a better player. Just my opinion. If my list went top 10 Boyce would likely be in it.I think that you may have forgotten some history about Boyce. . But snapped a leg in two can put a damper on an NBA career.
I think that you may have forgotten some history about Boyce. He was a sure fire first round pick as a senior. He dropped over 40 points on Kansas that year. But he suffered an horrific injury while playing in what I think was to be his next to last game. It was a horrible sight. Notwithstanding that, Atlanta took him on the second round and paid him to rehab. He spent the next year rehabbing and returned to try to make a comeback in his second year with Atlanta, but he could not return to form and that ended his time in the NBA. I think that Boyce was better in his time than anyone that I have seen play at CU over the past 36 years ... except for perhaps Chancey Billups ... But snapped a leg in two can put a damper on an NBA career.
Vandiver had sweet old man game.Scott > Vandiver > Harrison
I actually remember Boyce pretty well despite my obvious age. I thought he was going to be beyond special after his soph year. That year I wished he would take it to the hoop more. He finally did his senior year but his numbers dropped (19.1 soph, 22.4 jr, 18.9 sr). I think the primary reason for his senior decline is he tried to be a more well rounded player and not be a pure two guard. He could shoot the ball lights out and could take a game over if he was hot. Chauncey did that, hot or cold, Burks did that hot or cold (usually cold...in fact I don't think Burks was a very good shooter, no idea if stats support that though), even Dinwiddie took over games in ways other than scoring. Boyce was a scorer. I don't think that made him a better player. Just my opinion. If my list went top 10 Boyce would likely be in it.
For some of you that don't recognize those names and want to think those old timers weren't any good. See if you can find old info on Cliff Meely. Probably the single most athletically gifted player to ever step foot on a basketball floor for CU (regardless of era) and if I was judging players just on their playing time as a Buff as Slider mentioned above, it wouldn't even be a contest. Meely would be it with room to spare, but back issues hampered and shortened his pro career so I down graded him.
Harrison was rated significantly higher coming out of college than Scott is. There is a reason for that. Physically he was more imposing and had more upside than Scott does. Mind you he definitely had some issues with where his head was and he certainly didn't have the outside game Scott has. That being said, Harrison played with only one other borderline NBA caliber player and CU still managed an NCAA Tournament while he was playing. Scott has played with several other borderline NBA talents. Also, it wasn't till pro teams realized Harrison was a headcase that he slipped to the end of the first round. Scott isn't being projected in the first at all. So until Scott does something at the pro level (and I think he will) he can't really be bumped ahead of Harrison.