On that note, MacIntyre should bring back the ban on the color red.**** ****braska
**** ****tah
Worked for me, my son had to keep his jersey in the truck. I'd get it later and wash it but you aren't getting through the front door with that lol.On that note, MacIntyre should bring back the ban on the color red.
Just based on the way the schedule sets up, the game against Utah every year should be very meaningful for division titles, bowl positioning and/or bowl eligibility for one or both teams every year. With 63 historical meetings in a very close series (CU leads 32-28-3) to go with that scheduling, this will only grow as a rivalry. It's inevitable.
Just based on the way the schedule sets up, the game against Utah every year should be very meaningful for division titles, bowl positioning and/or bowl eligibility for one or both teams every year. With 63 historical meetings in a very close series (CU leads 32-28-3) to go with that scheduling, this will only grow as a rivalry. It's inevitable.
- I wonder how these numbers would (will?) change if CU is good for a few years in football. Our fanbase can be as obnoxious as any in the land when CU's good.
That's a good point about our fanbase and you can look no further than Nebraska for proof of that. The Nebraska fans don't seem to have much animosity for the CU teams, coaches, etc. But they freaking HATE Buff Nation. Its the first thing they whine about whenever the Buffs are mentioned.
Personally, I hate the Nubs for three reasons: 1.) Half the state moves to Colorado to find work and I just get so sick of seeing Nebraska Red in my home state. 2.) The self-righteous way they piss & moan about CU fans, as mentioned above. 3.) Their ability to trot out a kicker that looks like a back-up, walk-on fullback and have him drill field goals from 40 yards in. I freaking HATE that!!!
Did either of them bring up the fact that a new world based on program trends and media markets may actually exclude the Nubs?Interesting Husker Radio show the other day was putting together a New World Order for College Football that only chose 32 Programs/Teams for it. Essentially cleaning out all the dead weight in the conferences and creating a Super College Football Setup. They did not have specific criteria, but they were thinking about media market, tradition, power, fanbase, reputation, tv ratings, and other normal factors. They started by splitting everyone into 3 lists. List #1 was the FOR SURE programs, such as Alabama and Ohio State, etc... List #2 was the NO WAY programs, such as Vanderbilt, Kansas, or Iowa State. List #3 was the MAYBE list. So, List #1 filled up about 24 teams. List #3 had about 24 teams in it, which had to be reduced down to the final 8. The one announcer that is an actually pretty level headed guy mentioned Colorado multiple times based on tradition (minus the decade of hell), and of course the Denver Media Market. The other Moron could not even talk himself into the Buffs, and chose some other programs that will make you all pissed as hell. LOUISVILLE, BYU, UCLA, and was considering MINNESOTA for a while. In the end the smarter guy easily chose CU, while the stupid one NEVER chose the Buffs!!! Hate the color RED, Hate the Nubs, definitely want to kill them in 2018!!!
Did either of them bring up the fact that a new world based on program trends and media markets may actually exclude the Nubs?
They initially of course included themselves in the top 24 based on the blind love of the color red. However, they were smart enough to mention that as far as TV Contracts, National Exposure, and other factors could put them at risk to fall into the bottom of the list or possibly off of it. In a perfect world, they would be off the list, and programs like HOUSTON, UNLV, and even MINNESOTA would actually override the Skers if only the perfect factors were included. Ironically, they also mentioned that certain Rivalries would pull certain programs into the super conference, such as Auburn being brought in by Alabama, and the reason they mentioned UCLA was that USC would suck them in. I do not buy that and would argue that Auburn and UCLA would not be needed!!!
My Super 32 would be:
ALABAMA, CLEMSON, FLORIDA STATE, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, MIAMI, TEXAS, OKLAHOMA, MICHIGAN, OHIO STATE, PENN STATE, WISCONSIN, USC, WASHINGTON, COLORADO, ARIZONA STATE, HOUSTON, STANFORD, LSU, IOWA, NOTRE DAME, OREGON, KANSAS STATE, MISSOURI, TENNESSEE, TEXAS A&M, OLE MISS, SOUTH CAROLINA, and the final 3 spots would be argued between:
NEBRASKA, UCLA, PITTSBURGH, TCU, MINNESOTA, BYU, LOUISVILLE, MICHIGAN STATE, and UNLV
I actually thought of this College Super 32 as the minor league teams of the NFL???
I consider it a resounding success when Colorado fans still consider Nebraska a hated rival and Nebraska fans don't see the need to reciprocate.
How's the Utah rivalry going? Seems forced like what the B1G is trying to do with the Nebraska vs Iowa game.
Yep, you don't think about us at all anymore....I consider it a resounding success when Colorado fans still consider Nebraska a hated rival and Nebraska fans don't see the need to reciprocate.
How's the Utah rivalry going? Seems forced like what the B1G is trying to do with the Nebraska vs Iowa game.
Yeah. I don't think most Nebraska fans fully appreciate how much we hated you and how much that still lingers for CU fans over 25 years old.I consider it a resounding success when Colorado fans still consider Nebraska a hated rival and Nebraska fans don't see the need to reciprocate.
How's the Utah rivalry going? Seems forced like what the B1G is trying to do with the Nebraska vs Iowa game.