I think the pertinent info there is it's still early.CP doesn't seem to be closing at a high percentage on the top targets this cycle. It's still early but I don't think we've won the recruiting battles we were winning in 2023 and 2024.
Prime was out of action for 3 months.CP doesn't seem to be closing at a high percentage on the top targets this cycle. It's still early but I don't think we've won the recruiting battles we were winning in 2023 and 2024.
Yep. Color me concerned if we get through the full cycle and still have a class with an average rating that’s in the 40’s or above. Until then, I won’t be worried.Prime was out of action for 3 months.
Can’t imagine he was very involved with any recruiting during his recovery.
Prime is the most famous and well connected head coach in the country. If he wants Texas Tech money, he needs to leverage that status and his multiple billionaire (or at least high 9 figure) friends into helping the cause.Prime NEEDS and deserves a big wad of Cash
Texas Tech is not winning any recruiting battles, they are PAYING players to come and even paying them while still in HS. Prime is worthy of having an extra $20 Million to get exactly who he wants! It is a worthy investment for sure considering how 2026 and 2027 should be super special
It's not that early, NSD is just over 3 months away & CU is 7th in average rating, dead last in total points - far too many commits with only a couple P4 offers while beating out G5 teams. Big recruiting weekends didn't yield much in positive results (5/2, 5/9, 6/13, 6/16, etc.)I think the pertinent info there is it's still early.
I wouldn't be surprised if half of these early commits flip at some point,
Patience. A lot of time to flip some big names. Once CU starts winning games this season more recruits are going to see the future and flip to CUIt's not that early, NSD is just over 3 months away & CU is 7th in average rating, dead last in total points - far too many commits with only a couple P4 offers while beating out G5 teams. Big recruiting weekends didn't yield much in positive results (5/2, 5/9, 6/13, 6/16, etc.)
Where is this bag of money going to come from to flip big name guys? Didn't see much of a bump (if any really) after winning 9 games last year & improving by 5 wins from the year before. Effectively whiffing on the big visits this summer doesn't inspire confidence.Patience. A lot of time to flip some big names. Once CU starts winning games this season more recruits are going to see the future and flip to CU
I think the program bet the $20M NIL fund on the over so as soon as that hits we should be goodWhere is this bag of money going to come from to flip big name guys? Didn't see much of a bump (if any really) after winning 9 games last year & improving by 5 wins from the year before. Effectively whiffing on the big visits this summer doesn't inspire confidence.
It’s almost like Prine was t on campus for any of thisIt's not that early, NSD is just over 3 months away & CU is 7th in average rating, dead last in total points - far too many commits with only a couple P4 offers while beating out G5 teams. Big recruiting weekends didn't yield much in positive results (5/2, 5/9, 6/13, 6/16, etc.)
Someone like Felix Ojo didn't drop CU because Prime wasn't there, that's not going to be unique in the NIL era.It’s almost like Prine was t on campus for any of this
You do realize these kids were never committing when Prime wasn’t even around, right?
Like…you should basically write off everything that’s happened this cycle up to this point.
Prime is back…recruiting is going to pick up.
either go root for Texas Tech or win the lottery. Otherwise, be positive about what we have and where we are going and what Prime will be able to accomplish with the funds we haveSomeone like Felix Ojo didn't drop CU because Prime wasn't there, that's not going to be unique in the NIL era.
Ok?Someone like Felix Ojo didn't drop CU because Prime wasn't there, that's not going to be unique in the NIL era.
Well, I don't remember who Felix Eye is, so I doubt I care.
Again…not sure why you’re bringing him up.
I'd take another 5* OT
From what I heard, CU ended Ojo's visit early because he was openly talking about money and that CU wasn't a realistic option for him while he was on his visit. Who knows if that's entirely accurate but I think it's clear he is essentially a mercenary who was always going to the highest bidder. Nothing wrong with that, but CU is never going to compete for those type of guys and it's not just because they don't have the financial resources, but because Prime just doesn't play that game.
I'd take another 5* OT
It's been ruled that third party collectives can still pay players (was initially outlawed but then recently overturned), but yes, I believe theoretically all deals from collectives need to be approved and legit.... Whatever that means.Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought teams like Texas Tech were taking advantage of a small window of opportunity within the current NIL system to direct pay recruits until the new NIL system went into effect under the House settlement. Going forward, players will be direct paid by the school to the $20 million cap. NIL will still be there, but it has to be approved by a big four accounting firm as truly independent NIL.
CU did not scramble to slide in that way. Tech did. Other schools did.
Next cycle, recruiting should revert a bit back to the old ways somewhat, within the $20 million cap. Any other payments not auditor qualified under NIL will have to be an old fashioned illegal bag. However, enforcement teeth is no longer NCAA, it’s a federal court settlement. It’s not “show cause” anymore. It’s show me why we shouldn’t throw your butt in jail.
Thanks. It sounds like there is still much to hash out. My feeling is that schools want current style of NIL to go away, since it is a perpetual drain on the donor base to fund what is effectively a salary to the players at the expense of donations to the school. While there are schools with much bigger donor bases than CU, I believe there is palpable donor fatigue across the nation except from certain whales (Larry Ellison, for example).It's been ruled that third party collectives can still pay players (was initially outlawed but then recently overturned), but yes, I believe theoretically all deals from collectives need to be approved and legit.... Whatever that means.
Agreed. Seems like the vast majority of coaches and ADs want a level playing field from a player compensation standpoint. I saw something a week or so ago that said many coaches and ADs were exploring the idea of getting CBA in place without formally making players employees.Thanks. It sounds like there is still much to hash out. My feeling is that schools want current style of NIL to go away, since it is a perpetual drain on the donor base to fund what is effectively a salary to the players at the expense of donations to the school. While there are schools with much bigger donor bases than CU, I believe there is palpable donor fatigue across the nation except from certain whales (Larry Ellison, for example).