AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Local Media actually starting to take notice?
- Thread starter SuperD
- Start date
Of course it's good to have positive press, but my first reaction was, ew, **** those ****ers. I'm sure they could talk about Trevor Siemian's shoulder for the 13th day in a row.
He burned all bridges about a dozen years ago. **** Kiszla.
Except kizla.
DexBuffsteen
Well-Known Member
**** them! Let them slobber over Trevor's knob! The rise is real, it's ours. Denver media can suck a bag of dicks. **** 'em
Unfortunately for CU he is the guy the biggest newspaper in the region sends to cover CU. It sucks.
The radio jocks are definitely talking about the Buffs more often.
Buffenuf
massive tool
Time for this board's participants to flood the airwaves with BUFFTALK! Even Alfred Williams and CJ, former Buff QB spend waaaaaay too much time agonizing over the Donk's QBs and OL. There are only about three different ways to say they suck!
Someone has to jump on line, phone and text, and straighten these sports-stalkers out!
Bufffan68
Club Member
That's more a decision by their boss I think. That station is marketing as 24/7 Broncos. I'm guessing they'd love to talk more CFB...esp CJ.
Your second and third sentences seem contradictory.
Kuratz
Well-Known Member
First sentence is hyperbole. Second sentence maintains that a tiny fraction of their content is non-Broncos. There is no third sentence as I used a comma.
I count three.
Your first sentence is: "I won't listen to 104.3 anymore". Are you saying that's hyperbole?
L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
Well ... when you post something with such apparent certainty concerning your own post that's blatantly incorrect, you should probably expect to be corrected by "grammar Nazis."
The Monk
Club Member
No, literal means figurative as well now. So he's not wrong.
Oh really? Do you understand that "literal" and "literally" are very different words? "Literal" is an adjective, and is not awarded the same leeway in usage as the adverb "literally" is.
Of course, I was simply making the point that using terminology like this in the context of what was actually being said is stupid, and I only did that because the "grammar Nazi" charge was made in the context of a conversation that was not about grammar in the first place.
In other words, I was just ****ing with that poster. Literally.
