77buff
Well-Known Member
http://bleacherreport.com/tb/bcGmS
Bad news for the Nubs.
Bad news for the Nubs.
Any news on the NCAA sanctions? I know The Ohio State implemented voluntary restrictions, but I'd love to see the NCAA hammer them back to the stone age for cheating. Lack of "Institution Control" would be lovely...
Any news on the NCAA sanctions? I know The Ohio State implemented voluntary restrictions, but I'd love to see the NCAA hammer them back to the stone age for cheating. Lack of "Institution Control" would be lovely...
fify.$$$$$$$$$$ and free tatts....
This is all BS. I argue with my family and friends back there all the time. The NCAA needs to get off their ass and lay down the sanctions on osu. What's taking so long? Gene smith their AD must have paid some important people.
What's worse is, they get all this and land meyer and their recruiting is flourishing. Sure didn't work out that way for ol cu....
How hard would that be?http://bleacherreport.com/tb/bcGmS
Bad news for the Nubs.
U$C still probably conducts business as usual too. I doubt they've changed much.
USC received some of the stiffest sanctions handed out for awhile...5 years worth...2 years with no post season and 3 years with only 15 scholarships per year which is going to catch up with them soon.
Hopefully. I'm not sure it will though. Not if they get 5* and 4* players like they have the last few years. I'm not convinced that Lane Kiffin is a good coach, but they did finish the season really well this year.
Hopefully. I'm not sure it will though. Not if they get 5* and 4* players like they have the last few years. I'm not convinced that Lane Kiffin is a good coach, but they did finish the season really well this year.
Any news on the NCAA sanctions? I know The Ohio State implemented voluntary restrictions, but I'd love to see the NCAA hammer them back to the stone age for cheating. Lack of "Institution Control" would be lovely...
Yeah they did and I doubt it changed how they go about recruiting. Sorry but I dont buy it.USC received some of the stiffest sanctions handed out for awhile...5 years worth...2 years with no post season and 3 years with only 15 scholarships per year which is going to catch up with them soon.
Yeah they did and I doubt it changed how they go about recruiting. Sorry but I dont buy it.
What they will do is bring in as many 4 and 5 star guys as they can every year. If they run over on schollies allowed, they'll just run off guy's that don't cut it. Or some such douchy ****.Whether its getting them there or what happens after they are there, I doubt U$C will change what they do because of sanctions from the NCAA. Only way to totally turn them upside down is SMU treatment. These sanctions they have will hurt them in the short term, long term they will be the same U$C.
They will have great front line players, but no depth. You can't lose 30 scholarships over the next 3 years and not have it affect you. Especially looking at all of the 1st rounders leaving after this year. Plus there is the indirect consequence of those lost recruits probably going to direct Pac 12 competition making those teams better. Trust me, USC will be feeling the effects from this pretty soon. If the coaching staff can keep them winning, then that just means they are damn good at coaching.