AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
NCAA Tournament Day 3
- Thread starter cubuffs85
- Start date
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Don't think we'd lose by any worse than we did to Pitt, to be honest. Pitt was an exceptionally bad match up, as we saw. I have never seen a team hound players out of the post like that. At one point they hounded Scott from under the basket almost all the way to half court.
That's going to be the blueprint for how to play CU. Tad better have an answer.
Not a lot of teams have the roster to do that.
There could be another team but the only teams in the PAC 12 that can do that consistently like Pitt would be UCLA and the ***********
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Horrible game. 6 more turnovers than field goals in first half.
I don't know if UCLA can with the current roster (wear bros aren't super athletic). I think a team like Stanford or Oregon can.
Doubt Oregon could run it effectively with all their guards. They could make it difficult on the in-bound but they wouldn't have the size to effectively run it IMO. UCLA has a lot of length and size on the court combined with athleticism outside of the Wear twins. Not sure about Stanford, could probably be persuaded one way or the other.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
Dayton up on mighty Syracuse 20-18 at the half. If the NCAA was trying to increase scoring with its rule changes/interpretations ... it ain't working. :huh:
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
What a crap day of games thus far. Not only anticlimactic, but match ups that are not particularly appealing.
L Buff
Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left
Hoping Harvard-MSU will be dramatic ... Wisky and Dux too.
The biggest reason for Cuse's struggles down the stretch was their lack of offense and it's even worse tonight. SU's top 4 scorers went 3 for 19 in the first half. Pretty ugly half so far on both sides.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Wisconsin/Oregon is the most appealing of the day, although that speaks to how bad today's slate is more than anything. Would love to see Harvard surprise and give MSU a game.
That's the truth, other than Cuse playing for me personally. I had very little interest in the first 2 games (we would've been the national game in that first one
) and I thought UT-Michigan would be better but that never panned out. I also don't like how they only had 1 game on for the first 2 timeslots and then have the schedule back-loaded for the night games.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Michigan State's transition game...holy smokes.
CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
Makes me want to puke seeing Oregon on the verge of back to back Sweet 16s.
Come on Wisconsin, don't lose to these asscocks
God ****, Dayton is luckier than KU or the tar holes with their 3 pointers!
OK that was a travel
Go Flyers, I hate Boeheim
There isn't, but I did have Dayton beating Cuse in my bracket
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk