What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

NCAA votes to allow athletes to profit from likeness

SewallBeach

Let’s Build a Mansion
Club Member



The NCAA's top decision makers voted unanimously Tuesday to allow college athletes to profit from their name, image and likeness "in a manner consistent with the collegiate model."

The board said directed the three separate divisions of college sports to immediately begin figuring out how to update their rules in a way that maintains a distinction between college and professional sports. The board members said in a release Tuesday that all changes should make sure student-athletes have the same opportunities to make money as all other students, maintain a priority of the education and the collegiate experience and ensure that rules are "transparent, focused and enforceable" and do not create a competitive imbalance. The board wants each of its division to implement new rules by January 2021.

"We must embrace change to provide the best possible experience for college athletes," board chair Michel Drake said. "Additional flexibility in this area can and must continue to support college sports as a part of higher education. This modernization for the future is a natural extension of the numerous steps NCAA members have taken in recent years to improve support for student-athletes, including full cost of attendance and guaranteed scholarships."
 
“The return of the NCAA football video game series takes a big step forward with this news.”
giphy.gif
 
Great press release. They did nothing but say it sounds like a good idea someday.

It's even better than that. NCAA says to the divisions, we want you to come back to us with ideas in two years. Subtext: we're going to reject those ideas because they are not "consistent with the collegiate model" that requires paying next to nothing for labor.
 
This may be an overly optimistic viewpoint on my part, but I see that announcement as a good thing. Up until fairly recently, the NCAA was saying it would bar all California schools from participation in NCAA tournaments. This is a pretty dramatic shift in attitude for an organization that has resisted change with every ounce of its being for 100 or so years.
 
“The return of the NCAA football video game series takes a big step forward with this news.”

Yeah, I'm really happy for these kids, but I'm also deeply selfish and all I care about is playing NCAA football again. Plus this means another team working on football games for EA (or someone else?) and maybe that pushes Madden to get better?
 
Do whatever, we need NCAA football back damn it. :D

NCAA did us a huge favor and that might give EA Sports enough time to get a NCAA football videogame out next year. Would be a stripped down version.
 
I just wish Scottie Pippen was in college now so his beautiful face could be plastered across bill boards the world over and he could make a little scratch to lose playing cards.
 
Just read the ESPN article...guess no NCAA FB 21 since those new rules wouldn't go into effect until January 1, 2021 and I don't think EA Sports is interested in getting sued if NCAA FB 21 came out before then.
 
See how this works for the schools? Most fans would not know their favorite players in street clothes or without their school uniform on.
 
This guy is from North Carolina. Yes that’s the state school with the make believe classes for athletes.

 
I don’t buy it, this is bull****.

“in a manner consistent with the collegiate model."

Yeah, they voted...this is less about them passing it for the kids and more about them keeping power from the states who are threatening to take it away from them. This is a power move, nothing else.

In the end it may be best, as they’ll have 1 set of rules. But, they still did this for their own good.
 
I’m very proud of the NCAA for making this bold stand. Sure, California has already passed a law, and 16 other states have similar legislation pending. And the United States Congress is examining its own bill. And, of course, the NCAA didn’t really do anything. But, I’m really proud of the select committee for providing its philosophical support, with only a single vague qualifier, before sending this off to its various divisions for further study. The boldness. It’s inspiring.
 
I’m very proud of the NCAA for making this bold stand. Sure, California has already passed a law, and 16 other states have similar legislation pending. And the United States Congress is examining its own bill. And, of course, the NCAA didn’t really do anything. But, I’m really proud of the select committee for providing its philosophical support, with only a single vague qualifier, before sending this off to its various divisions for further study. The boldness. It’s inspiring.

Yeah, you said it much better than I did.
 
To me this sort of thing will add a “back door” for schools and boosters to pay recruits. It will be very difficult for the NCAA to monitor. Money is not allowed, according to what I’ve heard about it, to be paid to players from school funds or for playing a sport. But you will never convince me that the big money schools will not figure out a way to pay players using AD or booster money.
 
To me this sort of thing will add a “back door” for schools and boosters to pay recruits. It will be very difficult for the NCAA to monitor. Money is not allowed, according to what I’ve heard about it, to be paid to players from school funds or for playing a sport. But you will never convince me that the big money schools will not figure out a way to pay players using AD or booster money.

Of course they will find a way to pay recruits with booster money because it already happens. A lot.

But outside of maybe a handful of rogue schools, I do not see schools suddenly being stupid with AD funds when they can maintain plausible deniability by funneling payments through boosters.
 
Of course they will find a way to pay recruits with booster money because it already happens. A lot.

But outside of maybe a handful of rogue schools, I do not see schools suddenly being stupid with AD funds when they can maintain plausible deniability by funneling payments through boosters.
Time will tell. Well, probably not tell since it will all be under the table. But I’m always one to believe in unintended consequences.
 
This is the ethical thing to do, overall.

My biggest concern is to see what it will do to the AD coffers. Might find that some of that money originally slated for a donation to the AD goes to the student-athlete instead.

Regardless - this needed to happen.
 
As an NCAA football video game enthusiast, I had a thought. What if EA does this. They work to get a video game released by like may of next year. For every player who’s likeness is used (so pretty much all of them) they set aside the money for all players and then in 2021 the funds are released to all athletes. That way they can get the game out a year early instead of having to wait till 2021. Idk just a thought but I’m sure there are some ramifications that would come with it.
 
Back
Top