:yeahthat:
And this makes perfect sense. The Pac-10 needs more higher caliber bowl tie ins, and the Big 11 is already tied into too many other bowls to provide a team on the same level as the teams the Big XII sends to that game.
We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:
At least DD and I lived in SA for a year so we know where to get good margs for him to drown his sorrows.
:woot: :drink:
Just don't let FC get too close to your margs.... :smile2:
We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:
CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:
Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup:
Does anyone at CU run under 4.4 in the 40?
CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:
Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup:
Does anyone at CU run under 4.4 in the 40?
Not worried... By the time Locker gets UW to an Alamo level Bowl, the Buffs will have moved on to the BCS.... :smile2:
:yeahthat:
And this makes perfect sense. The Pac-10 needs more higher caliber bowl tie ins, and the Big 11 is already tied into too many other bowls to provide a team on the same level as the teams the Big XII sends to that game.
We'll kick Nick Montana's ass if we see him in that game, though... :smile2:
CU better hope it's Montana and not Locker:smile2:
Locker was just timed at a 4.38 40, and this is his first year with a real coach:thumbsup: