Buffs open as 6 point dogs (no pun intended) to the Huskies.
Agree but I was most disappointed in our flyers in punt coverage on 2 or 3 punts, and those guys are Chido and Laguda, not to mention Oliver and other good defensive players. Sing part of that unit.Need to really, really put a huge emphasis on special teams this week (all 5 days of it) and get the very best players in on all units. I think the lack of overall talent/depth really shows on the kick coverage teams.
Just curious....WTF is the meaning of your name?Need to really, really put a huge emphasis on special teams this week (all 5 days of it) and get the very best players in on all units. I think the lack of overall talent/depth really shows on the kick coverage teams.
Buffs open as 6 point dogs (no pun intended) to the Huskies.
Willingham said that was a "Safe" punt formation that wasn't designed for a return. Extra embarrassing.Agree but I was most disappointed in our flyers in punt coverage on 2 or 3 punts, and those guys are Chido and Laguda, not to mention Oliver and other good defensive players. Sing part of that unit.
Well, a lot more difficult than their stupid ****ing fans believe, anyway.Most spots now have us as 7/7.5 underdog. That's a huge overreaction to last weekend. In reality, Udub has only played one really good defense (USC) and one okay defense (UU). Stanford was very good overall, except for their midseason injuries against the WA schools that weren't reflections of their real quality.
There is very good film of defensive concepts from the USC game that will limit/stop Udub's offense. Udub is up against an extremely difficult challenege this week.
When Washington comes to play they are probably about 10 points better than us. If they play like they did against USC then I think it will be a toss up.Most spots now have us as 7/7.5 underdog. That's a huge overreaction to last weekend. In reality, Udub has only played one really good defense (USC) and one okay defense (UU). Stanford was very good overall, except for their midseason injuries against the WA schools that weren't reflections of their real quality.
There is very good film of defensive concepts from the USC game that will limit/stop Udub's offense. Udub is up against an extremely difficult challenege this week.
Gonna be a tough game. They are more talented but if it's close I think we win it...
When Washington comes to play they are probably about 10 points better than us. If they play like they did against USC then I think it will be a toss up.
The quality of the defense has an impact on a team's offensive output. It isn't just about will (i.e. "comes to play"). The reason why Udub hasn't lived in the top 4 this season is because they haven't played many strong defenses.
CU will be the toughest defense Udub had seen all year.
Here's their resume (ranks are scoring defense)...
1) Rutgers 116/128
2) Idaho 89/128
3) Portland State (not ranked FCS opponent - 3 wins/10th in Big Sky conference)
4) Arizona 118/128
5) Stanford (banged up) 18/128
6) Oregon 125/128
7) Oregon State 80/128
8) Utah 39/128
9) California 127/128
10) USC 25/128
11) ASU 123/128
12) Wazzu 56/128
Average Rank... 83.27. CU is the 13th ranked scoring defense in the FBS giving up 18.8 points per game.
Udub is not godlevel. They've run up the score against bad defenses. The average score against the 3 good defenses they played this year (even Stanford)... 29.33 to 18.67. Take out numbers against banged up Stanford... average is 22 to 25.
We were 7 pt. dogs in 2001 in CG vs. Texas.
It's a tough matchup for our defense though because they have two amazing receivers, just like USC was able to win some of those battles against chido and Witherspoon, Washington will be able to as well. And before you say we held them to less points that normal we got very lucky with those turnovers.The quality of the defense has an impact on a team's offensive output. It isn't just about will (i.e. "comes to play"). The reason why Udub hasn't lived in the top 4 this season is because they haven't played many strong defenses.
CU will be the toughest defense Udub had seen all year.
Here's their resume (ranks are scoring defense)...
1) Rutgers 116/128
2) Idaho 89/128
3) Portland State (not ranked FCS opponent - 3 wins/10th in Big Sky conference)
4) Arizona 118/128
5) Stanford (banged up) 18/128
6) Oregon 125/128
7) Oregon State 80/128
8) Utah 39/128
9) California 127/128
10) USC 25/128
11) ASU 123/128
12) Wazzu 56/128
Average Rank... 83.27. CU is the 13th ranked scoring defense in the FBS giving up 18.8 points per game.
Udub is not godlevel. They've run up the score against bad defenses. The average score against the 3 good defenses they played this year (even Stanford)... 29.33 to 18.67. Take out numbers against banged up Stanford... average is 22 to 25.
Ross and petit for huskies are a huge concern. Browning is right there with falk.
It's a tough matchup for our defense though because they have two amazing receivers, just like USC was able to win some of those battles against chido and Witherspoon, Washington will be able to as well. And before you say we held them to less points that normal we got very lucky with those turnovers.
Washington is also very physical up front and we struggle against those defenses like Stanford, USC, ucla and even Michigan started to figure us out and expose our offensive line in the second half.
Dislike. That team sucks.Looks like we get the Fox #2 team again, Joe Davis and Brady ****ing Quinn.
Will be very interested how their defense continues to perform with all the injuries they have had recently.I think we match up favorably on defense.
The bigger question is on offense. Washington has a very good, physical run defense and they can also get after the QB. Can the offense do enough (not just scoring, but avoiding three and outs)?
Will be very interested how their defense continues to perform with all the injuries they have had recently.