Pac's Choice of CU

[RalphieSpeaks]

For all those Texas fans and Baylor people that think that we somehow had to beat out Baylor so we bolted early.....

Then Scott took command of the Pac-10, made expansion a priority and gave the Buffaloes a chance to start over.
“Part of what I did was take a step back,’’ he said. “Compared to our peers, we were smaller: We were only in four states and 16 million households. I felt we needed at least 12 teams … We needed to get bulkier.’’
Scott presented three expansion models to the Pac-10 presidents, his targets based on geographic compatibility, cultural fit, revenue-generating potential, academic stature and commitment to a broad-based athletic program.

Colorado was the only school that appeared in all three models.





http://blogs.mercurynews.com/colleg...-and-colorado-officially-join-the-conference/

 

[sackman]

I'm unconvinced that we have a commitment to a broad based athletic program. Time will tell.

 

[RalphieSpeaks]

I'm unconvinced that we have a commitment to a broad based athletic program. Time will tell.

Yeah I am not convinced of that part myself but I know for damn sure Baylor was not on these models....that is all I am saying.....

 

[dply]

I'm unconvinced that we have a commitment to a broad based athletic program. Time will tell.

I can't believe that the Pac-12 would say something so sexist.

 

[MtnBuff]

Liked especially comment #4 (8:59pm time since they will change with further comments)

, I know I speak for the asses here when I say we are excited for September to roll around

.

Good for the Ute fans to recognize themselves, the Nubs fans never got this idea.:lol:

 

[The Guest]

I can't believe that the Pac-12 would say something so sexist.

Does it sound better if he replaces "broad based" with "Title IX"?

 

[dply]

Does it sound better if he replaces "broad based" with "Title IX"?

:nod: