seattlebuff
Well-Known Member
For context, my CU hoops experience goes back to the late 80s, when Vandiver was the star, and then Boyce, Chauncey, Harrison, Burks, Spencer, et al
My feeling is that Kin is the most dynamic, program-altering force to come into CU hoops since Chauncey. Not saying he's the best player (given his height, he's not even a sure-fire pro prospect) but given his immediate impact on the program this year and hopefully in the future, and the type of fearless, do-everything player and leader that he is, our success the next 2-3 years (which could be very high) rides squarely on him.
So is it crazy to think that the coaches should discourage him going for so many offensive rebounds? He's absolutely amazing for a guy his size, but we've seen twice now him having severe ankle rolls going for boards with bigs down low. It just feels like with so much of our success tied to his dynamic play, we can do without that part, with so much risk involved.
Is that a dumb idea?
My feeling is that Kin is the most dynamic, program-altering force to come into CU hoops since Chauncey. Not saying he's the best player (given his height, he's not even a sure-fire pro prospect) but given his immediate impact on the program this year and hopefully in the future, and the type of fearless, do-everything player and leader that he is, our success the next 2-3 years (which could be very high) rides squarely on him.
So is it crazy to think that the coaches should discourage him going for so many offensive rebounds? He's absolutely amazing for a guy his size, but we've seen twice now him having severe ankle rolls going for boards with bigs down low. It just feels like with so much of our success tied to his dynamic play, we can do without that part, with so much risk involved.
Is that a dumb idea?