For me, it has to do with the success he had at Stanford, coupled with the NFL success (especially seeing how awful the 49ers are now), and now the immediate success he's had at Michigan. Turning a sub .500 team into a top 15 team (should be a 1 loss top 10 team) in one year with the nation's best defense.Interesting to me that there's no love for Jimbo Fisher. Dude just went over 2 seasons without losing a regular season game.
It's also interesting to me the perception of Harbaugh. He's never won a conference title. Shaw has 2, fwiw.
Interesting to me that there's no love for Jimbo Fisher. Dude just went over 2 seasons without losing a regular season game.
It's also interesting to me the perception of Harbaugh. He's never won a conference title. Shaw has 2, fwiw.
Can you please explain number 5?1. MacIntyre
2. Leavitt
3. Walters
4. Lindgren
5. Neinas
Honorable Mention: Saban
Lotta people really like ***.
**** the censors. C.U.M.
Dantonio
Snyder
Patterson
Briles
Cutliffe
My criteria is measured purely based on "how much better is the program now than when they got there". Some guys like Harbaugh receive some votes, but I think he inherited a lot more talent at both Stanford and Michigan than these guys did when the took over their programs. These guys are in the discussion though for sure.
You are really going to say harbaugh took over a good situation when stanford was 1-11 before he got there? I agree that Michigan had talent but stanford was a tough situation.
There is so much pressure at the big jobs, just look at how usc, florida, Texas and Michigan have struggled lately. Just because there is talent on the rostwr doesn't mean it is easy to win.
Dantonio
Snyder
Patterson
Briles
Cutliffe
My criteria is measured purely based on "how much better is the program now than when they got there". Some guys like Harbaugh receive some votes, but I think he inherited a lot more talent at both Stanford and Michigan than these guys did when the took over their programs. These guys are in the discussion though for sure.
You are really going to say harbaugh took over a good situation when stanford was 1-11 before he got there? I agree that Michigan had talent but stanford was a tough situation.
College football success is so driven by having an exceptional quarterback. So I think when evaluating coaches it's important to look at whether a coach is able to maintain greatness when he's got issues at that position. Also, to avoid overrating a coach because he had a great run with a supreme talent behind center and there isn't much else on the resume. On that note, the biggest omission from my list was Les Miles.
You could also argue the continued issues at QB is the biggest strike against Miles in terms of being an elite coach.