Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Real GM P12 Preview

Just hoping for a tourny bid? :lol:

If we're just hoping for a bid then so is Stanford and Utah.
 
Hanner is one of the best out there. His stuff has been discussed a lot lately - especially in the Furd thread.
 
I think that "just hoping for a tourney bid" is a bit of a stretch, but other than that, it was fairly spot on.

And just think, we were "just hoping (and praying) for a tourney bid in 2010 & 2011.
 
'Tini said:
I don't understand the UCLA love, at all. Same with Stanford.
Click to expand...

The only thing not to like about Furd is Dawkins, that is a solid squad and despite the player they lost should improve and make the tourney.

UCLA could take several steps back from last year's team and still be very good, Alford may not be the right guy there but he's a good coach, go back and watching his in-game adjustments against us last year.
 
absinthe said:
The only thing not to like about Furd is Dawkins, that is a solid squad and despite the player they lost should improve and make the tourney.

UCLA could take several steps back from last year's team and still be very good, Alford may not be the right guy there but he's a good coach, go back and watching his in-game adjustments against us last year.
Click to expand...
The Dawkins problem is a big one though. As for UCLA, not getting Ocetus and Bolden were pretty big blows and I think they'll take a significant step back without Anderson, the Wear twins, and Adams.
 
no mention of our incoming frosh or that we lost fletcher for a big stretch too. yes, we need a number of players other than josh to elevate their games but i think that will happen, at least for some of them.

i think ucla will struggle a bit, at least early, they lost a lot of experience and while the frosh are talented, may take some time to mesh it together.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top