Good news, I am now liking our TE depth for the fall.
Hobbs, Fernandez, Slavin, Irvin, Ray is a good bunch to have at TE.
Good news, I am now liking our TE depth for the fall.
Hobbs, Fernandez, Slavin, Irvin, Ray is a good bunch to have at TE.
He gets an A for consistency.
Irwin happy now.
[tweet]342070251103600643[/tweet]
Marques Mosley would be my guess. I thought I heard something a while back about Juda Parker also having issues. Anyone have more insight?
Based on Mosley's tweets, I'd agree, but in Ringo's story that he wrote after that tweet added that the player in question "was not a regular contributor." Mosley was sixth in tackles, played more than 500 snaps, had one of our three picks and returned a kick for a TD. Under Ringo's description, I would tend to say it isn't Mosley. Parker, maybe — he had 19 tackles all season.
24hr rule but....If you know who, isn't that what Barzil is for?
Too bad, thought he would be good when he signed. That class of RB's that EB recruited hasn't done much. Catalon clearly was the gem and we lost out.My guess is he disgraced the #19 last year...
Too bad, thought he would be good when he signed. That class of RB's that EB recruited hasn't done much. Catalon clearly was the gem and we lost out.
Timmy wasn't the one who was giving you a hard time about spelling. I believe the "consistency" he speaks of is in relation to you seeming to think everyone on the Buffs roster is a good football player and that every position group has good depth as long as there is an adequate number of bodies at the position.
My statement was I like the depth at TE. I didn't say that I like the depth at every position.
Not a huge fan of the QB, OL, WR, DL,Safety depth. I don't think we have a proven QB, a starter at this point. The QB competition is wide open going into the fall.
I think the facepalm was about the general belief on this board that TE remains a position of concern. Not spelling, or the assumption your excitement over depth applied to all positions.
I think the facepalm was about the general belief on this board that TE remains a position of concern. Not spelling, or the assumption your excitement over depth applied to all positions.
Yes, but it was almost dumb luck. He was still considered a FB vs. CSU IIRC.In fairness to EB, Powell looks like he'll be pretty good.
My statement was I like the depth at TE. I didn't say that I like the depth at every position.
Not a huge fan of the QB, OL, WR, DL,Safety depth. I don't think we have a proven QB, a starter at this point. The QB competition is wide open going into the fall.
WR is a concern for you, but TE isn't?
Good point. If there's a position on this football team that appears to have actual depth, it's WR.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2