Curious what your thoughts are besides a double well. I think it is a good move, Offensive line looked soft and weak at point of attack. Our team speed was no better than it was in 2014. We looked just there in the 4th quarter, no better than most teams when a lesser team must be better conditioned.Well well
Would you be happier if we didn't make changes?Kind of a red flag we are seeing changes to key positions every offseason.
I think we are seeing the original plan is being abandoned. MacIntyre had requested a change in S&C after last season. I think McChesney may be the pick here. He was interviewed for a position last year but if he got the Top S&C job he may take the job. He certainly would bring some intensity and passion to the job and I think he would help the big guys with technique.Kind of a red flag we are seeing changes to key positions every offseason.
Would you be happier if we didn't make changes?
It seems like you're forcing the staff into a lose-lose situation.
The more major changes you make to a coaching staff, the more you have to question the head guy. Nothing unfair about that IMO. Only so many more scapegoats to go around.
The more major changes you make to a coaching staff, the more you have to question the head guy. Nothing unfair about that IMO. Only so many more scapegoats to go around.
The S&C coach always gets too much blame and too much credit. I remember everyone touting Foreman when he was brought over with HCMM
I think we are seeing the original plan is being abandoned. MacIntyre had requested a change in S&C after last season. I think McChesney may be the pick here. He was interviewed for a position last year but if he got the Top S&C job he may take the job. He certainly would bring some intensity and passion to the job and I think he would help the big guys with technique.
I thought the issue with McChesney was his business and the potential for recruiting violations if he were to join CU and have high school kids attending his strength & conditioning programs. I thought I read that he would need to divest from his business?
My appetite for losing FB is satisfied, thank you for asking. If Neinas remains, well, why bother...I get nervous that with Walters and Foreman gone, we might not see the underperforming coaches let go. I don't know what MM's appetite for turnover is.
My appetite for losing FB is satisfied, thank you for asking. If Neinas remains, well, why bother...
If Neinas returns, my fall Saturday evenings will likely not be spent in front of the TV.
Kind of seemed like there was a riff between Mac and Foreman last offseason. Foreman made some comments about Mac wanting "bigger and stronger" and made it seem like what Mac wanted went against Foremans plan
Foreman getting let go before accepting a position with UNLV is a surprise. Hopefully, the delay with coaching upgrades are because there are s0 many interrelated factors, i.e. coordinate the hires to cover the different positions and the different recruiting areas.I get nervous that with Walters and Foreman gone, we might not see the underperforming coaches let go. I don't know what MM's appetite for turnover is.
Depends on who you ask. For instance, if I ask you, the answer will assuredly be 0% (including MM himself).Whoa.
So what percentage of MM's origin staff was any good?