Spruce might not be the most explosive guy out there, but he seems like the kind of guy that can field them consistently and not lose yards trying to reverse directions.
Last year we had 89 punt return yards, for the season.
I still think the fumble at the end of the half on the punt against CSU changed the season. If we don't turn it over there we are up 14-3 at half I think and we probably win that game. I also think we would have beat Sacramento State and who knows, maybe we end up winning 4 games total.
The worst part is the year before we did the same thing against Ohio State. Fumbled a punt on our own 10 with 15 seconds left in the half. I told myself Embree would learn his lesson but I was wrong. Why against CSU are we even putting a guy back with less than 20 seconds to field a punt on his own 10? So stupid.
Last year we had 89 punt return yards, for the season.
Opponents only punted 16 damn times ALL SEASON.
16 punts in a 12 game season. That is incredible.
Given our D, I'd say the opponents failed 47 times to score instead of us forcing a punt :wow:We forced 47 punts. We only returned 16 of them. The rest were out of bounds, or fair caught.
http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/defense/split01/category06/sort05.html
We forced 47 punts. We only returned 16 of them. The rest were out of bounds, or fair caught.
http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/defense/split01/category06/sort05.html
Special teams are important. You can be a terrible football team, but if you've got really good special teams, you can pull out 3-4 wins per year. I don't think we're at the point where we can say we have really good speaical teams.
:lol:
:rolling_eyes:
You don't believe that? Why not? Special teams tilt the field. If you have really good special teams, you can be pretty bad and still manage to pull out a few wins in a year. I absolutely believe that.
dunno. I think solid special teams mostly prevent you from losing 3-4 games per year. (remember CSU and UU last year?) Usually teams that win with special teams are also very good at defense.Special teams are important. You can be a terrible football team, but if you've got really good special teams, you can pull out 3-4 wins per year. I don't think we're at the point where we can say we have really good speaical teams.
I believe that, but I think we're far from having good special teams. Our return game is below average. We kicked virtually 0 FGs. Our kick offs fell short, and our return coverage was dreadful.
dunno. I think solid special teams mostly prevent you from losing 3-4 games per year. (remember CSU and UU last year?) Usually teams that win with special teams are also very good at defense.
I agree completely. We're far from even average special teams, IMO. Hawkins had what appeared to be an outright disdain for special teams. It was like he wished it wasn't even part of the game, and gave it the attention he felt it deserved. Embree at least seemed to care about it, but was incapable of actually improving it.
Spruce might not be the most explosive guy out there, but he seems like the kind of guy that can field them consistently and not lose yards trying to reverse directions.
You don't believe that? Why not? Special teams tilt the field. If you have really good special teams, you can be pretty bad and still manage to pull out a few wins in a year. I absolutely believe that.
Jon's two seasons were worse than any Dan Hawkins team except 2006 from a KR/PR stand point by a mile.
Edit, was there a rule change between the 06-07 seasons for Kickoffs?
I don't see us being outstanding but even being competent would be a huge step up from the last couple years.
It may give 1-2 games for an otherwise good team, but not 3-4 wins for a terrible team. JMHO
6 of those were on 3rd down because they felt bad for us.We forced 47 punts. We only returned 16 of them. The rest were out of bounds, or fair caught.
http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/leader/national/team/defense/split01/category06/sort05.html
I'm with you-would love someone with more speed if he also had good hands. Why not someone like DD?Seems like a pretty conservative choice. Probably makes sense for early in the season. I'm pulling for Mosely for kickoffs.