jjbuffs13
Well-Known Member
The Good:
Obviously P-Rich on offense and Gillam on defense. I really liked the intensity and aggression in the first quarter, however....
The Bad:
We have to get touchdowns instead of field goals. We were in the red zone 4 times (the 16 yard line, the 5 yard line, the 14 yard line, and the 6 yard line) and only managed 9 points. Think about had we started the game 7-0 instead of 3-0. We left at least 16 points on the field, 57-32 is a totally different ball game in the 2nd half with as much confidence as those TD's would have given us.
The Ugly:
Has to be 3rd-down conversion rate. 0-15...a week after going 2-15. This HAS to change if we want to compete in the future. Even converting 5 of those (that's still a small amount) and we get more offensive production.
Obviously P-Rich on offense and Gillam on defense. I really liked the intensity and aggression in the first quarter, however....
The Bad:
We have to get touchdowns instead of field goals. We were in the red zone 4 times (the 16 yard line, the 5 yard line, the 14 yard line, and the 6 yard line) and only managed 9 points. Think about had we started the game 7-0 instead of 3-0. We left at least 16 points on the field, 57-32 is a totally different ball game in the 2nd half with as much confidence as those TD's would have given us.
The Ugly:
Has to be 3rd-down conversion rate. 0-15...a week after going 2-15. This HAS to change if we want to compete in the future. Even converting 5 of those (that's still a small amount) and we get more offensive production.