I know it is still unlikely but I will be very worried if we find ourselves at 5-6 and playing Fresno in early december for bowl eligibility.
When will we hear an announcement, I wonder? I'd bet this week.
Yeah, that is my reasoning as to why I'd bet this week. Also, from the sound of the MWC commissioner, it sounded like getting this game in is a priority to the conference (cha ching). There will be pressure to bear on a school like UNLV to help make this happen, I'd think.They've got to move quickly if we're aiming for Oct.19th. Football requires some serious logistics that we don't often think of (just as an example, the equipment trucks. they did a feature on Oregon's equipment truck with their trip east two weeks ago -- 44 hours each way)
Yeah, that is my reasoning as to why I'd bet this week. Also, from the sound of the MWC commissioner, it sounded like getting this game in is a priority to the conference (cha ching). There will be pressure to bear on a school like UNLV to help make this happen, I'd think.They've got to move quickly if we're aiming for Oct.19th. Football requires some serious logistics that we don't often think of (just as an example, the equipment trucks. they did a feature on Oregon's equipment truck with their trip east two weeks ago -- 44 hours each way)
Yeah, that is my reasoning as to why I'd bet this week. Also, from the sound of the MWC commissioner, it sounded like getting this game in is a priority to the conference (cha ching). There will be pressure to bear on a school like UNLV to help make this happen, I'd think.
I thought it was strange that the MWC commissioner openly acknowledged that the UNLV coaching staff "is already on the hot seat" and that they may not want to mess with their schedule. Pretty sure that a BCS commish would never say that.Yeah, that is my reasoning as to why I'd bet this week. Also, from the sound of the MWC commissioner, it sounded like getting this game in is a priority to the conference (cha ching). There will be pressure to bear on a school like UNLV to help make this happen, I'd think.
I thought it was strange that the MWC commissioner openly acknowledged that the UNLV coaching staff "is already on the hot seat" and that they may not want to mess with their schedule. Pretty sure that a BCS commish would never say that.
Play UNC for all I care. Make it 12 games. Maybe Central Arkansas can get us the hook-up with Incarnate Word
Doesn't playing a second FCS game screw us for bowl eligibility if we make it to six wins?
First off, talking about bowl eligibility is still pretty far-fetched. Second, I am pretty sure they did away with that rule but I could be wrong.
MWC needs every game against BCS conference schools they can get, especially ones that they think they have a good chance of winning to argue for their credibility. This is even more important this year considering the bad start they got off to so far against the major conference opponents.
Also considering the low confence media payouts Fresno isn't exactly rolling in money. I have no idea what the payout is for this game but I doubt they want to delay it for a year or two and also lose the revenue since they would have to give up another game on the schedule to fit it in.
First off, talking about bowl eligibility is still pretty far-fetched. Second, I am pretty sure they did away with that rule but I could be wrong.
At least they are looking at multiple options. I really like the San Diego state idea.
I am not sure what the SDSU idea is other than they might have a bye on 10/19 but don't they already have 12 games scheduled? Are they allowed a 13th? Do they travel to Hawaii or something?
If it's possible, I think this would be a great option as well.
EDIT: But San Jose St also has a bye on the 10/19 and they also travel to Hawaii. SJSU might be an even better option because of HCMM just coming from there. that would be fun!
The NCAA allows one victory per season over a Division I FCS team to count toward an FBS team's bowl eligibility, so long as the FCS team has supplied financial aid for football averaging out to at least 56.7 full scholarships (90% of the limit of 63 allowed to FCS schools) over "a rolling two-year period" that can include the current season. And can only count one win towards bowl eligibility per season. There is also a clause stating you can apply for waiver which I am guessing if we get to 5-6 we might be granted if we cannot pick up another game. Even as ****ty as the NCAA I think holding a team out due to a national disaster is press even the NCAA would be terrified of.
That you for the clarification. I knew they changed it recently but couldn't remember the details.
No it's not. We have four winnable games (SC, Cal, Utah, Oregon State) on our schedule, two are at home. All of those teams have looked very beatable at this point in the season. Scheduling a team like SDSU could very well be the difference between going 5-7 or 6-6 for this team.