did your aggie friends tell you that?Want. Want. Want. I have a few aggie fans, and they are not going to shut up about this one. This is absolutely huge for them. I understand CU football culture would never support something on that scale, but some renovations and improvements to folsom and a practice facility? C'Mon mike, get it done
North of 102,000 seats making A&M the largest stadium
Huge luxury suites/lounge
Huge interactive museum/concourse
Keeping the students where they belong/have been
Considering all aspects of the game day environment and incorporating everything
Keeping 12 special seats empty as a memorial to the bonfire victim.
Everything is included
did your aggie friends tell you that?
Oh I'm not talking about the renovations (although they are spectacular) I'm talking about the website, the video the overall polish of the campaign... if CU wants the money to roll... a slick website/presentation will help
How much will the project cost and how will it be funded?
The total cost of Kyle Field Redevelopment is $450 million. 51 percent will be funded by annual seat licenses, 27 percent will be funded by Kyle Field Campaign gifts, 17 percent will be funded by Texas A&M students and 5 percent will be funded by the local government agencies.
Any sort of decent communication on the plans (website or whatever) and any sort of decent coordination would help. And you HAVE to get small and large donors involved. We have no designs/culture for fostering ongoing donations from everyone (small and large). Unless you actively pay close attention to what the AD is trying to do, which is clearly not a large crowd, you have no idea what's going on up there and you get all your information from the Henderson's of the world. I know people think the fact they are showing us plans means there is commitment, but I'm not that encouraged. Commitment would include an entire department that is capable of running a coordinated capital and ongoing donation campaign. I've written this before, but my high school (heck even my elementary school) puts CU athletics to shame in this department.Oh I'm not even talking about the renovations (although they are spectacular) I'm talking about the website, the video the overall polish of the campaign... if CU wants the money to roll... a slick website/presentation will help
CU=Small-time
I see no reason why you wouldn't demand it from the AD and the University. I'm not going to bash the CU Foundation, since they have been very effective at raising money for academics. Hopefully now they are increasing their focus on athletics. Nonetheless, shouldn't an effective AD be/have been fighting for these resources (from the Foundation and University)? I suspect the AD probably has and it has been falling on deaf ears. So I like to believe the University and AD share the blame.Oh, you mean, like the ENTIRE CU FOUNDATION, which already exists as the 501(c)3 non-profit, fund-raising arm of the University, has lots of employees, has nice offices over on Walnut Street in east Boulder, has a branch already devoted to CU Athletics and has successfully raised close to a billion dollars for the academic side of CU in their last major campaign?
That kind of "entire department" ???
Well now, Bunky, why aren't your complaints and suggestions aimed over there toward the Walnut Street Gang, THAT "entire department" ?? Its their job!!!
Bohn's job is trying to run the Athletic Dept., you know: plan travel, schedule, balance a budget, contract with coachs, concessionaires and deal with the press.
I see no reason why you wouldn't demand it from the AD and the University. I'm not going to bash the CU Foundation, since they have been very effective at raising money for academics. Hopefully now they are increasing their focus on athletics. Nonetheless, shouldn't an effective AD be/have been fighting for these resources (from the Foundation and University)? I suspect the AD probably has and it has been falling on deaf ears. So I like to believe the University and AD share the blame.
Exactly. Also, exactly why I am not going to put blame on the CU Foundation. Furthermore, my frustration is showing. Benson did say his focus is on athletics now, so I will pipe down from now on and let it play out. I apologize.The leadership has to come from the university president. Benson has admittedly been focused on fundraising for things other than athletics. He has said that he is now focusing efforts in this direction. I'm interested in seeing how it plays out. If we get our facilities plans funded, then it's not just hot air from him.
So you work for the Foundation, eh? Well, I WILL put the blame on them. I've spent a large portion of time with Foundation types and can tell you, that unless they with the Ath. Dept. portion of the Foundation, the rest look down their noses at the AD!
If I've heard it once, I've heard it about a thousand times from that quarter that, "The Ath. Dept.'s and the football/basketball program's success has nothing to do with CU's fund-raising ability!" i.e. all those free commercials and national TV exposure through games, means exactly nothing to the Foundation employees; their attitude is they are above all that and can't be bothered with that! Its called "institutional bias". Thus, Bohn can't make them do anything other ask they provide liasons and a very limited number of employees. Benson can also ask or bring political pressure to bear, but the Foundation is its own entitiy, answering to neither the AD or the Prez.
Entirely different culture and market. Almost like two separate countries. About the only similiarity is that both schools nominally play American Football. One in a place where the game is strongly rooted in a tradition going back generations within families and communities. The other in a place that does not have that tradition or culture. If you built that in Boulder, it would sit half-empty even in the best years. The carrying-cost alone would be ridiculous. Every Aggie I know (and I know many) wear their ring with pride and are still very tuned in to their University. Other than the guys I played with and you guys on this site, I really do not know any Buff alumns who give more than a passing crap about athletics. Its not wrong, its just different. We are definitely better suited to the PAC 12.
Entirely different culture and market. Almost like two separate countries. About the only similiarity is that both schools nominally play American Football. One in a place where the game is strongly rooted in a tradition going back generations within families and communities. The other in a place that does not have that tradition or culture. If you built that in Boulder, it would sit half-empty even in the best years. The carrying-cost alone would be ridiculous. Every Aggie I know (and I know many) wear their ring with pride and are still very tuned in to their University. Other than the guys I played with and you guys on this site, I really do not know any Buff alumns who give more than a passing crap about athletics. Its not wrong, its just different. We are definitely better suited to the PAC 12.
Ndakomg Suh gave back to Nebraska as soon as he was drafted and he gave like $2 million. When did we have any ex-Buff player give back like that? The fans are getting a lot of blame in this situation but how about the alumni that played football at CU?
Good point though.
Ndakomg Suh gave back to Nebraska as soon as he was drafted and he gave like $2 million. When did we have any ex-Buff player give back like that? The fans are getting a lot of blame in this situation but how about the alumni that played football at CU?
Good point though.
CU's website has been a joke for years now.
It is amazing to me that they can have a pretty good audio/visual team (their production of the spring practices was pretty good, really) but their web design team is terrible.
I'm sure they have a designer (maybe one) - but the CU website is just a stock layout/functionality that they probably purchased. I've seen it all over the place with other colleges
I'm sure they have a designer (maybe one) - but the CU website is just a stock layout/functionality that they probably purchased. I've seen it all over the place with other colleges