I have heard multiple times this year by announcers mentioning the brick games that the game being played that day was a brick game. I definitely remember it being mentioned during the UCLA, WSU, and Utah games, and I think there was mention of it during the Oregon game, but maybe that was discussion after the game.
My question is - do we have a ton of brick games this year, or do games that we might have thought would be brick games at the time get eclipsed by wins later in the year?
Specifically - I think we all would have said at the time that Oregon was a brick game. But is it now? I think it was still a big win in terms of our confidence that we could win big games, but now that we've won bigger games and Oregon has obviously spiraled into new coachdom, is it a brick game?
What about Stanford? Ugly, yes, but still really big - much bigger than Oregon, imo.
Is WSU still a brick game? What about Utah? Are either of them brick-worthy? Both?
I think the increasingly awesome nature of this season has really changed our views of some of the wins we've had along the way.
My question is - do we have a ton of brick games this year, or do games that we might have thought would be brick games at the time get eclipsed by wins later in the year?
Specifically - I think we all would have said at the time that Oregon was a brick game. But is it now? I think it was still a big win in terms of our confidence that we could win big games, but now that we've won bigger games and Oregon has obviously spiraled into new coachdom, is it a brick game?
What about Stanford? Ugly, yes, but still really big - much bigger than Oregon, imo.
Is WSU still a brick game? What about Utah? Are either of them brick-worthy? Both?
I think the increasingly awesome nature of this season has really changed our views of some of the wins we've had along the way.