May it last for a long time.Is there anyone who thinks that Helton is the best coach that USC could get for its HC job? Does anyone in the USC administration even think that? I don't think Helton even believes that himself.
It's rare to see mismanagement on the level USC is operating at. Impressive.
It’s CU-esque.It's rare to see mismanagement on the level USC is operating at. Impressive.
It might not take long to recover on the field, but USC has some major issues looming with attendance and donations.
It’s CU-esque.
USC just needs a Saban and it'd take off. Luckily they keep trying to milk the PC tree and/or giving Helton the job.
It’s just sad that USC let itself fall into that mode with all their advantages.
I think a great argument can be made that the Pac-12 is struggling in large part because of how badly USC has bungled things.Just another reason to laugh when usc fans blame the pac 12 and Larry Scott for their lack of relevance.
Yup. When your two best programs in football and basketball don’t do whatever it takes to win it is not going to go well. UCLA basketball and usc football are killing this conference right now.I think a great argument can be made that the Pac-12 is struggling in large part because of how badly USC has bungled things.
Compare this with the Big Ten -- remember when there were the national stories about the decline of the Big Ten, the population shift and whether the rust belt could compete with the coasts and sun belt regions (the other P5 conferences)? Ohio State hired Urban Meyer. Michigan hired Jim Harbaugh. Penn State hired James Franklin.
In the Pac-12, Washington did its part as one of our premier programs by hiring Chris Petersen. UCLA did its part by hiring Chip Kelly. Did Oregon do its part by going Helfrich-Taggart-Cristobal after Chip left for the NFL? Has USC done its part with all of its post-Pete hires? Did ASU do its part by hiring Herm Edwards?
oh, they just need what well might be the greatest coach to ever grace a college sideline? alrighty then.