Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Voting Underway for new Pac-12 CCG logo

Which Pac-12 logo did you vote for?

  • Logo One

    Votes: 7 8.1%

  • Logo Two

    Votes: 31 36.0%

  • Logo Three

    Votes: 36 41.9%

  • Logo Four

    Votes: 12 14.0%
  • Total voters
    86
Voted for Logo Three myself...that logo does remind me a bit of the old Pac-10 logo and it is having a hot competition with Logo Two which is awesome looking.
 
2, but 3 is ok.

Nice formatting that you can't even see #4 on the page where you actually vote... :lol:
 
#3

I don't like the light green logo color that #2 introduces.
 
I chose #2...the Roman numerals on #4 look horrendous, and for some reason the first thing I thought of when I saw #3 was the cover of a video game for an EA Sports game...between #1 and #2 I liked logo #2 a little bit more but I can't really qualify why...
 
I actually liked #4, but didn't vote on it because it would be a wasted vote (can't even see it on the screen). Went with 3 instead, which has a small lead currently. wohoo!
 
This


logo-2b.jpg


/contest
 
#1 looks the most solid and Bold. 3 looks like a frickin pineapple and 2 looks like the top of a wine glass.
 
From a branding standpoint, #1 doesn't emphasize Pac-12 enough and #2 doesn't emphasize football enough.
 
Buffnik said:
From a branding standpoint, #1 doesn't emphasize Pac-12 enough and #2 doesn't emphasize football enough.
Click to expand...

I don't know if the PAC-12 needs to be way bigger than the championship part for just the game. I like that it kind of says, "who cares about anyone else? This is THE championship game you should care about."

The bottom of #2 is like frankenstein's wife manicured bush.

#3 just feel weak with it's little frills. It just doesn't look solid to me. More like a high school championship game
 
I agree.
I picked #3. But in Black and Gold.

If the roman numerals under #4 didn't look so strange, I'd have gone with that option.
 
Okay, how bout a compromise. This doesn't look great (I just downloaded the app and learned how to use it because of my 'vision.') I don't think I would want the sunrays in it but I couldn't figure out how to edit them out . . .
250312_10100268975058723_10207447_53261548_341869_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Four

I think the NFL pulled off a marketing masterstroke by using the Roman numbers for the Super Bowl and the P12 would be wise to follow suit. Just don´t use the year, but rather number the P12 CCG games.
 
between 2 and 3 for me. 1 does not have the pac 12 logo big enough. 4.... well, i just dont know wft 4 is about.

so, 2 and 3.... the spikes in 3 were just too.... well.... i dunno. so! 2 it is.​
 
Jens1893 said:
Four

I think the NFL pulled off a marketing masterstroke by using the Roman numbers for the Super Bowl and the P12 would be wise to follow suit. Just don´t use the year, but rather number the P12 CCG games.
Click to expand...

i think the roman numerals look like crap in that one. the point about roman numerals is they look like roman numerals and grant the "austerity" of the past. these are all new-fangly. i don't the Pac conf games numbered as "VI" in 6 years is going be meaningful. conference championship games are largely forgettable to everyone but the teams playing. this a new thing moving forward. also, the Big XII had roman numerals....so seems unnecessary and possibly derivative to me. jmo.
 
Jens1893 said:
Four

I think the NFL pulled off a marketing masterstroke by using the Roman numbers for the Super Bowl and the P12 would be wise to follow suit. Just don´t use the year, but rather number the P12 CCG games.
Click to expand...

Voted four for the same reason, but really any logo works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top