Both short-term and long-term. Relevant because I think there has been such an interesting reaction to basketball success under Tad Boyle.
This. Then when we're upset about winning only 8 games change that to 10+ and top 15 ranking or the world is falling apart.My expectations for the football program are that it gets to a level roughly the same as where the basketball program is now. I want to expect to win every home game, regardless of opponent. I want to be in the conversation for conference titles. Understanding there are off years from time to time, but that those are exceptions, not the rule.
The basketball team wins twice as many games as it loses. That's pretty much where I want the football program to be. 8-4 records will get you into bowl games and will have you ranked more times than not.
My expectations for the football program are that it gets to a level roughly the same as where the basketball program is now. I want to expect to win every home game, regardless of opponent. I want to be in the conversation for conference titles. Understanding there are off years from time to time, but that those are exceptions, not the rule.
The basketball team wins twice as many games as it loses. That's pretty much where I want the football program to be. 8-4 records will get you into bowl games and will have you ranked more times than not.
Delete your mid term and scale back your long term a little bit and you have my answerShort Term: Bowl Game. Don't care how.
Mid Term: Going into every season with the mindset that CU can legitimately compete for the Pac 12 South, and not being laughed at by other P12 fans for having that mentality.
Long Term: Being a perennial bowl team that is always on the fringe or in the top 25, with every 2-3 years being able to vault into the top 15 and have a legitimate shot of winning the Pac 12 and earning a playoff bid.
Fair enough. What does your scaled back long term look like?Delete your mid term and scale back your long term a little bit and you have my answer
Every 2-3 years seems a little optimistic imo. Maybe every 5.Fair enough. What does your scaled back long term look like?
Yeah, I guess I just look at it like, if we're a fringe top 25, 8-4 team every year, then hopefully every 2-3 years we'll have recruited well enough and have the pieces to be a top 15 team. I would take every 5 years too, though.Every 2-3 years seems a little optimistic imo. Maybe every 5.
Bowl game EVERY year
Compete for pac12 south title every 3
Pac 12 title 1 out of every 5 years.
Fair. All home games/CSU in 2016 should be considered "winnable". Of the home/neutral games, I could see them going 4-3 or 5-2 (best case), which means they'll have to get themselves at least one, if not two road wins...Sure Wins: Idaho State
Likely Wins: Oregon State
Slight/Moderate favorite: Colorado State
50/50: Washington State, Utah
Slight/Moderate underdog: @Arizona
Likely Losses: Arizona State, UCLA
Sure Losses: @Michigan, @Oregon, @Southern California, @Stanford
That sounds more like a ceiling.Is that a goal or expectation? Because that equates to 2 national championship playoffs a decade
Basketball expectations are different. This is a football school. Consistently pretty good and entertaining won't cut it. Need to get to that level and maintain it first, though. The 2017 recruiting class needs to be good enough to set a realistic expectation of competing for conference titles starting 2-3 years from now.
Is that a goal or expectation? Because that equates to 2 national championship playoffs a decade