BTW CSU's prez has said fundraising was going slower than he thought it would and they're still not half way there yet. Supposed deadline of October this year. Jack Graham has gone quiet
Unpossible. She's a screamer.Has 'Gasm gone quiet on the topic?
I'm not nervous for them. According to their fans and school, they are never at risk for anything, and things never go bad and everything is always part of a master plan.
I'm actually nervous for them. They have spent a lot of money on coaches and restructured their salaries to reflect trying to take it to a new level. This hasn't moved the needle on attendance. The lack of a hit on fundraising makes the whole bring in a business man AD project seem like it could have been a mistake, and now they are right where they started with more $'s spent and no invitation to the big boy money train conferences.
In the end, having several viable football schools in Colorado is a good thing. I'm very excited CU is moving forward with their project. I'm sorry, although not surprised, that the whole internet chatter about the money already having been raised was just more BS. I wish CSU the mountain conference had not formed the Mtn Network. It took a fun mid week ESPN game machine and moved the conference backwards in my opinion. CSU's business school just schooled CU's in the rankings. Hopefully that is a wake up call for that department at CU and hopefully they can use some of that business acumen to market their football program and get their stadium sold out for 3-4 games a year.
:lol:Just got back from the stadium meeting. The feasibility firms there have done reports on hundreds of new stadiums and 50+ football stadiums.
CSU can expect a MINIMUM of $13million in extra revenue each year due to the stadium and a max of $22million. This comes from naming rights of the stadium, loge boxes, box seats, club seats that aren't at Hughes. An attendance of 37,800. Sounds like sustainable revenue.
They expect the fundraising to be at $212-490million. So yeah, $212million minimum.
Owned. Told you so
wasn't it supposed to be done by this summer too? or was that 2015?
Originally, yes. Now 2018 "at the earliest."
2016 has been and remains the goal.
Just got back from the stadium meeting. The feasibility firms there have done reports on hundreds of new stadiums and 50+ football stadiums.
CSU can expect a MINIMUM of $13million in extra revenue each year due to the stadium and a max of $22million. This comes from naming rights of the stadium, loge boxes, box seats, club seats that aren't at Hughes. An attendance of 37,800. Sounds like sustainable revenue.
They expect the fundraising to be at $212-490million. So yeah, $212million minimum.
Owned. Told you so
2016 has been and remains the goal.
CSU professor Jim Klett, director of the PERC, said he's been assured if approved, construction on a new stadium would not begin until the gardens had moved, a process he expects to take anywhere from 18 to 24 months.
But beginning a move south for the gardens couldn't happen until the current research projects of graduate students and national firms are completed at the end of the 2015 growing season (October). That would push the potential opening date of the on-campus venue back significantly from its initial 2016 target
Slider really deserves a lot of rep for finding this little gem. I have to ssra before I can hit him, but this is gold, Jerry. Pure gold. The only bad part is that we can't get 'gasm back here to laugh at him some more. The guy is a treasure trove of idiocy.
212million minimum is the best part
Also justified since his brother is the one leading the charge, amirite?I'm particularly fond of "owned. Told ya so."
I know it's mean to laugh at the retarded kid, but it's just so damn easy in this case.
I'm particularly fond of "owned. Told ya so."
I know it's mean to laugh at the retarded kid, but it's just so damn easy in this case.
I would've repped Slider if he'd posted a gem with "jelly?" in it.
Also justified since his brother is the one leading the charge, amirite?
I thought you had to wait til the growth cycle of your greenhouses was complete ('16). Then 2 years to complete after that, only after finding a new location for the greenhouses
This information came from an article done by Matt Stephens who failed to properly check his sources (imagine that). He interviewed one professor for the story and never confirmed the timeline with anyone else in the athletic department. The goal still remains 2016. It might eventually change, but no one is talking about that right now.