I'm going to go with 12, which I think would be a nice situation. Being a 12 seed opens some possibilities to sneak deeper into the tournament than you'd imagine, as 5 sides are often ripe for the picking. An 11 seed would be absolutely ideal. I'd be disappointed with a 13 seed -- a 23 win champion of a power conference (and again, the Pac hatred has gone overboard) deserves better than that. Even still, there are some relatively weak 4 seeds this year so even that wouldn't spell certain doom.
IIRC ... there have been more 12-5 seed upsets over the years than any other in the first round ... too lazy and tired (and ecstatic) to look it up right now. :smile2:
11
That's the seed I want. And I want the West Region. Pac-12 Champs deserve to be in the West.
When you say this, do you actually mean you want us to be put in the West Region or just sent to one of the sites in the West for the first/second rounds? Because the 2 aren't necessarily the same.
Of course both would be ideal. :smile2:
When you say this, do you actually mean you want us to be put in the West Region or just sent to one of the sites in the West for the first/second rounds? Because the 2 aren't necessarily the same.
Of course both would be ideal. :smile2:
I mean that I want us in Albuquerque, which I guess means I want a 12 or 13 seed. That would put us in Phoenix if we can get through to the Sweet 16.
You sure about that putting us in Phoenix? Thought they changed it a few years back where the first round sites don't neccessarily match up with the Sweet 16/Elite 8 sites. If you look at ESPN's bracket, Albuquerque is in two different regions.
To answer the seed question I'm expecting a 12 or a 13. The win over Arizona doesn't bump us up enough to jump enough teams that we were behind on the bubble going into yesterday which is what would need to happen to get an 11 seed or better.
Lunardi is one wierd looking dude. Is this all he does? Or does he have a real job?