What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

What the new HC inherits

Buffnik

Real name isn't Nik
Club Member
Junta Member
Part 1 - Offense

Once the 2022 season quickly went off the rails, the question really became whether Karl Dorrell had left the cupboard bare for the next guy or if there was enough talent on the roster heading into 2023 to form the basis of a rebuild.

We're learning a bit more about the younger players every week. This post might be a bit premature, but the HC search is happening now. So I figured it would make sense to look at the roster, not pay any attention to current commits since that's completely in flux, and take a look at what we'll have and where we need the most immediate help.

Offensive Line
For the first time in a long time, we'll have everyone expected to return and actual class balance within this group.

The regular starters have become fairly entrenched and have drastically improved from where this OL was 12 months ago. That still makes it no better than a competent OL, but that's a foundation to get some things done on offense. Below is what's returning (class in parentheses is what the player will be in 2023).

LT - Gerad Christian-Lichtenhan (Junior)
LG - Casey Roddick (Senior)
C - Van Wells (Sophomore)
RG - Tommy Brown (Senior)
RT - Jake Wiley (Junior)

Key Reserves: Frank Fillip (Senior, starting experience at OT), Austin Johnson (Junior, starting experience at C/OG), Noah Fenske (Junior, starting experience at C/OG), Alex Harvey (Junior, playing experience at OT/OG)

Other reserves have not played much, if at all, so all that can be said is that there are another 5 true and redshirt freshman expected to return and develop in the position pipeline.

2023 Needs: If all 14 scholarship OLs return, this is probably a spot where we see 4 or 5 new players, with maybe all of them HS recruits. OL represents 22.7% of your starters (5/22), so the natural number is to have 19/85 scholarship players (83 non-specialist scholarships x 22.7% = 19).

OL Coach: Kyle DeVan was OL Coach at Arizona during Sumlin's last 2 years when OL was the strength of some bad teams. Last year he was the OL Analyst at Michigan, working under Sherrone Moore. Had a rep at UA of being a good recruiter. New HC should have complete authority on choices of assistants, but DeVan wouldn't be a bad "keep" to give the OL some much needed continuity after 3 different position coaches + 1 interim position coach over the past 4 years and significant improvement this year.

Quarterback

Sub-par QB play has been a major issue and no one on the roster has shown he can deliver plus performance from the position.

Key Returnees:

JT Shrout (Junior, part-time starter in 2022). Shrout bring some moxie and a cannon arm, but accuracy and decision-making questions. Probably better as a veteran who can come in for relief than he is someone to be relied upon as a starter.

Owen McCown (Sophomore if he plays any more snaps and doesn't redshirt, part-time starter in 2022). McCown sees the field well and processes information well, especially for a true freshman. Physically needs to develop. Seems to have the tools needed to make all the college throws and, while not a dual-threat, can make the occasional play with his legs. Potentially the QB of the future, but hasn't cemented that role.

Drew Carter (Junior or RS-Sophomore, depending on how much he plays; limited backup snaps in 2022 and 2021). Carter is a plus athlete who has also participated on the CU basketball team as a walk-on. Doesn't appear like he will ever be the starter, but is someone who has the potential to add a positive wrinkle to the offense by entering the game for some "Wildcat" style packages as has been seen in a very limited amount. Useful player to have in the QB room if he stays.

Maddox Kopp (Sophomore, backup). Transfer from Houston who seems to have the frame (6'5") for the position along with solid athleticism. Hasn't done enough to see the field in 2022 and may not factor in any time soon. Needs a lot of development.

2023 Needs: If CU can get a proven grad transfer (Michael Penix Jr, Bo Nix, etc. have made huge impacts at Pac-12 rivals in 2022), it would make a huge impact on the season prospects. Otherwise, it will likely be a season of developing McCown and hoping that he's ahead of schedule to be a winning P5 quarterback.

QB Coach: Mike Sanford. Also the OC before becoming the Interim HC. (Also Nate Dodson, a young coach whose role expanded after Sanford's mid-season elevation.) Sanford has not improved the offense much from a historically bad 2021, so there's not a lot of faith in him from the fan base as an OC/QB Coach. He has done a very admirable job as I-HC, but I think most CU fans would prefer to see him parlay that into getting a HC opportunity elsewhere than to seem him return on the 2023 staff. Sanford's become a guy to cheer for and fans have come to appreciate, but it's probably best to move on.

Running Back

It looks like a balanced group with complementary skill sets which can be productive. It also doesn't seem to have a guy who can be relied on as a horse to carry the run game every week or anyone who is a game breaker. The only loss from the 2022 backs is Alex Fontenot, who has been a steady, smart and tough RB when healthy, who was reliably productive.

Key Returnees:

Deion Smith (Senior, part-time starter). The most productive back in 2022, Smith is best in the open field when CU can get him in space through short passes or running to the edge.

Jayle Stacks (Junior, backup). Recruited as a fullback, Stacks has transitioned to "big back" and has shown a lot in recent weeks as a north-south runner who has improved his burst enough to not be limited to only running inside the tackles (though he's still a step slow on runs outside the tackles). Useful player who also give FB versatility in a jumbo set.

Anthony Hankerson (Sophomore, part-time starter). Maybe the biggest surprise in 2022, Hankerson went from greyshirt to joining the 2022 roster at the 11th hour. He was still expected to redshirt, but when he got his chance showed himself to be a tough runner and competitor with good balance and acceleration. Potential to be an every down back, but hasn't shown that he can be a game breaker.

Victor Venn (Freshman, battling injuries). Probably the guy who was expected to emerge this year, but he hasn't been able to get healthy and is now likely to redshirt. Breakaway speed, so on paper would be a solid 1-2 punch with Hankerson in the future. Needs a good offseason to put on some mass.

2023 Needs: This is likely a spot where recruiting a freshman or two is all that's needed, but like with any position a transfer should be entertained if a clear upgrade is available.

RB Coach: Darian Hagan. For years, he's gotten productivity from the position under different HCs, OCs and systems. Recruiting is limited and you'd like to see your RB Coach doing a lot more to bring in talent across the roster. Definition of a true Buff, and that's valuable to the team's coaching leadership. New HC will have to make a decision here and if Hagan's role will be as a position coach or something else in 2023.

Wide Receiver

Entering the 2022 season, the focus was on a group of seniors: starters Daniel Arias and RJ Sneed, with Maurice Bell and Jaylin Jackson providing depth. As the season has progressed, underclassmen have take over the top roles and other underclassmen have flashed.

Key Returnees:

Jordyn Tyson (Sophomore, part-time starter). Camp reports were that he has the potential to be special but has to physically develop. He's got a good frame and is young for his class, so this offseason could see a major jump in his physique. Has shown star potential and had big games, including the last one where he also showed his athleticism with a punt return touchdown. Definitely a plus player for the Buffs at WR.

Montana Lemonious-Craig (Junior, part-time starter). Flashed in 2021 and has built on it in 2022. Looks like he can be a very solid #2 WR who makes some tough catches in traffic and has a knack for getting open. Seems like he will be a productive player a team can win with as a starting WR who can play both slot and on the outside.

Chase Penry (Sophomore or Junior - depending on if he ends up playing enough to not redshirt, battling injuries). Flashed in 2021 as a reliable possession receiver who might be a guy who can work out of the slot as a guy who plays with toughness and finds holes in the defense. Sneaky athletic. Not going to be the star WR, but someone who can be a useful, productive piece to a winning offense if he can get healthy.

Ty Robinson (Sophomore, depth). Decent size and athleticism. Has flashed both in 2021 and 2022. Looks like a player who will be a productive piece in the WR rotation and is young enough to have upside.

Chase Sowell (Freshman, redshirting due to injury). Great frame for the position and a lot of upside. Started to flash before injury ended his 2022 season. Potential starter in the future, possibly on the outside with MLC moving to the slot or he should factor in as the primary backup. I'm very high on him.

Grant Page (Freshman, redshirting). Great frame and one of the top in-state recruits in 2022. Nothing much can be said here except that he looks the part and we'll have to see how he develops.

2023 Needs: Need to continue filling this pipeline with good HS recruiting. 6 returning scholarship WRs is not enough when 2-3 start and the position is heavily rotated. You want to have 9 or 10 scholarship WRs, so CU will need to bring in 3 or 4 guys. Potential for a grad transfer here, particularly if it was a jitterbug type who can make things happen in the open field out of the slot.

WR Coach: Phil McGeoghan is new in 2022 and also serves as the Assistant HC. Seems to be a charismatic, energetic coach. Respected career, much of which was in the NFL. Recruiting is a question mark since he doesn't have a track record. Looks like this is a good coach it wouldn't be objectionable if the new HC kept, but again that's totally the new HC's decision.

Tight End

The one player in the 2022 group who has been productive is Brady Russell, who is graduating. This position group will be young in 2023 and needs attention.

Key Returnees:

Caleb Fauria (Sophomore, depth). Good size and athleticism. 2022 has been a developmental year with him getting some playing time. There is probably some potential here, but he hasn't really flashed much so far. Has battled injuries, so may be on track to turn a corner in 2023 as a 4th year sophomore (Covid year is causing some weirdness on eligibility class).

Erik Olson (Sophomore, depth). Pretty much a repeat of the Fauria description. Either or both could be serviceable starters or even have upside beyond that, but we haven't really seen it yet.

Austin Smith (Sophomore, depth). Upside is extremely high. All the physical tools to be a difference maker, but is learning the TE position from the ground up after playing WR in a basic spread offense in HS. Has flashed, including a very athletic touchdown catch.

Zach Courtney & Louis Passarello (RS-Freshman, depth). Two guys who look the part on size & height. Nothing much to be said until we get to see them play and how they develop.

2023 Needs: With 5 scholarship TEs returning, the position group numbers are fine without adding anyone. Maybe a position which was over-recruited the past couple classes. It's a spot where a grad transfer & projected starter would be very helpful. We can get by without a HS signee, but taking 1 to keep the position pipeline clean (and maybe counting on some attrition) would be in order.

TE Coach: Clay Patterson. Came from Minnesota, where he did great work since 2018 with the TE group. Background is OK & TX, with some recruiting chops. Rep as a good teacher who players develop under, which this young group needs. Serving as OC after Sanford's elevation to I-HC. Another assistant coach I wouldn't mind keeping, but again would not force anyone on the new HC.

Specialist (Offense)

Since they score points, I'm putting the Place Kicker here and I'll put the Punter on Defense. We return our PK and are in very good shape.

Cole Becker (Junior, starter). Has done a very good job as our PK for 2 seasons. Has been accurate and can make kicks from distance. In 2022, has been excellent on kickoffs with making sure they are not returnable. Needs a bit of improvement with consistent ball striking on his field goals (sometimes lacks height), but this is a player the team can rely upon the next 2 years to do a good job.

***********************************************

Overall, I would say that there's a solid foundation for a new HC on the offensive side. The Buffs lose very little from the 2022 team. Unfortunately, that's both good and bad -- good because development, growth and chemistry should be there, bad because this has not been a good offense so it's hard to envision dramatic improvement with mostly the same cast of characters. But there's enough talent to compete and for CU to win a fair share of games as long as the Offense doesn't have to carry the team. Have to figure out QB, most of all, while getting progression from other position groups. Adding a few impact transfers could turn things positive in a hurry.

Next up is the Defense.
 
Good job but I think you are overly optimistic.

Our OL starters tend to get dominated when faced with P5 level defenders.

RBs may not be fair to criticize because that OL rarely gives them consistent holes to run through but unless Venn shows we don't really have a back who can make a good play into a big play.

Same thing with WRs and QBs. Our QBs haven't consistently have the protection needed to confidently hold the ball (in the pocket or on the roll) to allow patterns to develop.

Might be that biggest immediate impact we could get in the off-season would be the addition of 2-3 P5 starting quality offensive linemen from the portal.

Good new though is that looking at your realistic evaluation it is clear that under KD this team was not performing close to it's potential. That potential still may not be great but at least it isn't as far from competitive as it looked in the games when KD was on the sidelines.
 
Good write up, Nik. Agree with Mtn that it’s probably overly optimistic. I favor a new HC who is known as an offensive guru (and then go cheap in the OC with a young guy, and spend money on the DC), who will also coach QBs. If that happens, the big question will be, does he bring a starter with him, via transfer portal, or does he try 2023 with McCown as his QB? This offense (and this team) needs something to give the fans some optimism that next year could be fun.
 
I think this offense need transfers at every position in order to be optimistic about being competitive next season. I also don’t think they can go into the season with Shrout, McCown, Carter and Kopp as your QB depth chart.
Didn’t Kopp already leave a couple weeks ago or am I imagining things?

edit: Nevermind that was Mott, carry on.
 
I think this offense need transfers at every position in order to be optimistic about being competitive next season. I also don’t think they can go into the season with Shrout, McCown, Carter and Kopp as your QB depth chart.
Every position group on this team could use an upgrade (it’s no accident they’ve only won one game). With the tighter window to bring in transfers though, I think you’re going to have to identify maybe 4-5 positions where you are in greatest need and prioritize those. I’d say QB for offense, and then focus heavily on the defensive side of the ball.
 
Didn’t Kopp already leave a couple weeks ago or am I imagining things?

edit: Nevermind that was Mott, carry on.
Lewis went into the portal. Kopp already had his transfer (from Houston), so I doubt he bounces again.
 
Part II - Defense

On defense, CU has had one of the worst run defenses in the country in 2022 despite having a very veteran front 7. A lot of the guys from the 2-deep in that front will be graduating so there are both question marks and some holes to fill. In the back of the defense, it has been a young secondary which had 3 projected 2022 starters transfer out and our lone senior/returning starter being injured most of the season. It's been a developmental year in the secondary, but everyone returns. So while there are serious questions, the cupboard isn't bare and there is a foundation on which a new HC can build.

Defensive Line

This is a mixed bag. CU is losing a lot on the edge with the graduation of Terrance Lang and Chance Main from the DE position, Guy Thomas and Jamar Montgomery from OLB (edge rusher), and a bit of interior DL depth with Justin Jackson. That's going to be hard to replace and there is a particular hole with edge pass rushing from DE and OLB for 2023.

Key Returnees:

The interior DL is experienced and is a group which gives CU a significant size advantage to clog up the middle if coaching and offseason development gets these guys playing to their potential, as we've seen in flashes. The traditional DE spot, occupied by Lang and Main this season, is a roster hole heading into 2023.

Jalen Sami (Senior, starter). A 2017 HS graduate who grayshirted, redshirted and got a Covid eligibility year. Assuming he comes back, this will be his 7th season since his senior HS season in 2016. A 4-year starter who checks in a 6'6" 330, Sami's a space eater who can occupy multiple blockers.

Na'im Rodman (Senior, starter). Another big body, listed at 6'2" 300 and maybe a bit bigger than that. Another space eater, but has flashed a bit on TFL ability when he plays with leverage. Smart, coachable guy. Solid starter on the interior DL.

Tyas Martin (Sophomore, depth). The only real size CU has on the DL behind Sami and Rodman, Martin has seen increased playing time as 2022 has progressed and looks like he will be a solid player in the 2023 rotation with the potential to eventually be an effective starter. 6'4" 330, so another space eater who projects similarly to Sami in his role.

Ryan Williams (Sophomore, depth). Probably the hand-on-the-ground DE type out of the group, Williams has seen limited game action in 2022 and made some tackles. He will need to make a huge jump this offseason to be more than a depth piece.

Aaron Austin & Ryan Baugh (Freshman & Sophomore, depth). Neither have played this year. Austin is probably 35 lbs away from where he needs to be for CU's defensive scheme. Baugh, who is a year ahead and had a redshirt year, is still 20 lbs away from where he needs to be. Both need to have good offseasons.

2023 Needs: Biggest holes are true DE who can play hybrid of either rushing off tackle from the strong side while setting the edge in the run game or taking on a double team to free up the LBs to blitz or flow to the ball when in a 3-man front. Probably a spot for using both the transfer portal as well as signing a prep recruit (maybe more than 1 from each bucket). On the interior DL, another big body would be nice -- especially if there was some way to get a junior out of the portal for class balance.

DL Coach: Gerald Chatman. He has also been elevated to DC since the firing of Wilson. Only 34, most of his experience is NFL or FCS. Seems to favor a more aggressive style to generate TFLs, which I'm not sure fits the personnel. Maintaining gap integrity and leverage while getting off of blocks has been a major problem in 2022. Not a lot on the resume as a recruiter. Probably an assistant the next HC moves on from, though he does have a motivating personality which has helped.

Linebacker

This has been a spot dominated by seniors in 2022. On the Inside, Quinn Perry, Josh Chandler-Semedo and Robert Barnes have logged a ton of snaps and made a lot of the team's tackles this season. On the Outside, Jamar Montgomery and Guy Thomas have also been stalwarts in the 2022 defense who have been involved in a lot of tackles. There is a lot to replace here.

Key Returnees (Inside):

Marvin Ham (Junior, depth). He did get some spot start action in 2022, but hasn't been involved in a lot of plays. He needs to step up in 2023.

Isaac Hurtado (Junior, depth). Limited action in 2022, has only been involved in a few tackles. Has to improve a lot for 2023.

Mister Williams (Sophomore, depth). Similar to Ham & Hurtado, he has played but has yet to make a major impact or take many snaps from the seniors. Needs a big offseason.

Aubrey Smith & Eoghan Kerry (RS-Freshmen, depth). Both have seen a bit of action and can still redshirt, which would probably be for the best. Some question of whether their futures are at ILB or OLB. Reports on both are that there is a lot of upside. It would not be surprising to see either/both play a big role in 2023.

On the Edge, there's not much coming back we know much about.

Joshka Gustav (Junior, depth). Hasn't been able to get past injury and see the field in 2022 after the projection was that he'd play a significant role on the defense. Him getting himself ready for 2023 would make a big difference for next year's defense.

Devin Grant (Sophomore, depth). Probably the biggest bright spot among the young Buff linebackers. But even though he has flashed, that still means single digit tackles so far this season. Definitely a guy with potential that the defense is counting on in 2023.

Zion Magalei (Sophomore, depth). Very limited action in 2022. Needs to develop.

Shakaun Bowser, Kaden Ludwick & Oakie Salave'a (RS-Freshmen, depth). We know almost nothing about these guys. I'm putting Salave'a here instead of Safety because it seems to be a better fit for his body type at 6'4" 220 (and we need height + speed in a bad way). Developmental players who have an opportunity to bust through a wide open position group for 2023.

2023 Needs: It's hard to trust that CU has any starters to pencil in for 2023 for what is generally 4 starting positions with opportunities for depth players to log a good number of snaps. With 11 scholarship players returning, the group being unproven, and this group also being very young (no 2023 seniors and 3 juniors), this is a spot that could definitely use a grad transfer or two. With that, there's also a need for prep recruits. You'd want about 15 guys, so that's 4 total even with no attrition. Generally, though, when you have a good number of guys at the same position in the same class this will lead to attrition so the Buffs could probably sign more than 4 LBs this offseason. A big issue here is that CU's defense has lacked speed and length at LB. Major issues with QBs passing over the top, RBs outrunning LBs to their gap, a lack of edge pass rush, and challenges staying with TEs in coverage. We need speed and more speed in our LB corps.

LB Coaches. Mark Smith (44) & Jeff Smart (35). Smith is known as a TX recruiter and has been on staff for a while. Coached DBs and was recruiting coordinator at Arkansas. One of the coaches I'd be very ok with the new HC finding a spot for among the defensive assistants. Smart was elevated when Wilson was fired and has been working with all LBs. A hard-nosed, fundamentally-sound tackling machine as a Buff player, he went on to some success coaching in the Ivy before getting QC opportunities at Mizzou and CU. Be nice to keep him involved somehow, even if as QC for defense.

Cornerbacks

Probably the team's biggest question mark heading into 2022, it's a pretty settled position for 2023 with all starters and depth slated to return.

Key Returnees:

Nikko Reed (Junior, starter). Maybe the best athlete on the team, Reed is a speedster with excellent quickness. A bit undersized at 5'10" and light (I'm not sure I believe the 185 lbs on the official roster). Technique and ball skills have been developing this season and the athleticism is starting to show. With a good offseason to allow more physicality and press coverage, could be one of the better CBs in the Pac-12 in 2023.

Kaylin Moore (Junior, starter). Probably a more well rounded CB than Reed who is a bit more physical and does more to support the run game but, like Reed, is only 5'10", Moore is a solid CB to match up with the other team's WR2. He's clearly progressed as the season has gone on and is a quality starter for 2023.

Nigel Bethel (Senior, depth). He's battled some injuries since camp and never really got things going. Probably a depth piece in 2023, but could be the primary Nickel and could be relied upon to spell Reed or Moore if needed.

Toren Pittman (Junior, depth). A much bigger CB at 6'4", Pittman has not seen the field much in 2022. Maybe a player who should put on some weight this offseason to be able to play more in the Safety or Rover positions where he can best utilize his length.

Simeon Harris & Jason Oliver (Sophomore, depth). Both have played as true freshmen this year and probably won't redshirt. Harris and Oliver are both 6'0", so give a bit more length on the outside than our starters. Both also need to add some strength & size this offseason. There's a solid pipeline with good potential here.

Joshua Wiggins & Keyshon Mills (RS-Freshmen, depth). Decent length with both these guys at 6'1", but we haven't seen much yet. Developmental.

2023 Needs: Probably not a spot to take a veteran transfer. This is more about taking 1-3 preps (depending on attrition) and keeping the pipeline in place.

CB Coach: Rod Chance. Was CB Coach at Oregon and Minnesota as well as DC at Southern Utah. Only 37 years old. Seems to be an active recruiter who has done a solid job with the CBs in 2022. Wouldn't be the worst retain for the new HC.

Safeties

Isaiah Lewis was one of the team's most experienced starters returning in 2022, but injuries have mostly kept him out. The team also graduates Anthony Lyle, a walk-on who earned a scholarship in fall camp, from the Safety group.

Key Returnees:

Trevor Woods (Junior, starter). Woods is a big Safety at 6'1" 200 who has started to make plays the past few weeks. Has had some issues playing deep safety and coming up to support the run from there (bad angles), but also gets into a lot of tackles. Potential to be a really good player the next 2 years.

Jeremy Mack (Junior, part-time starter). Mostly a starter since Lewis has been injured, Mack was a JUCO transfer who has been pretty solid in 2022 and getting better. Good frame at 6'0" 190, is probably penciled in as the 2023 starter.

Tyrin Taylor (Junior, part-time starter). Taylor has worked his way into a starting role and looks like a solid player who is getting better. At 6'2" 185, he needs to have a good offseason and become a more physical player in 2023. Can also play some Nickelback.

Jaylen Striker (Senior, depth). A bigger Safety at 6'2" 200, Striker has seen regular playing time this season as a backup. Should be a solid depth piece in 2023.

Dylan Dixon & Xavier Smith (RS-Freshmen, depth). A couple of 6'2" guys who need to put on some mass, there's quite a bit of potential here. Both need to develop this offseason.

2023 Needs: Safety could use 2 or 3 recruits, depending on attrition. Maybe a spot for a grad transfer but it's possible to roll with what's on the roster and develop the position group. Definitely need a prep recruit or two.

Safety Coach: Brett Maxie. Veteran coach (59) who spend almost his entire career in the NFL. Much more of a teacher than recruiter. I would assume this is a coach the next HC will move on from.

Punter

Trent Carizosa (Sophomore, starter). Walk-on who got the job after the scholarship Punter left the team. Averaging 42.4 yards per punt and has put 7/26 inside the 20. Some challenges with Net Yards and consistency, but looks like he's done enough to return in this role in 2023 and probably be put on scholarship.

Special Teams Coach: Chris Reinert. Elevated from QC to an assistant spot when Dorrell was fired, Reinert has done a nice job with Special Teams. Whether this position is an assistant role or a QC/Analyst position in 2023, Reinert has done a fine job and could be retained without issue.

**********************************************

Defense has some pieces for the new HC along with some young depth developing, but there are some significant holes. The interior DL and the Secondary should be very solid in 2023 if everyone returns. Pass rush and LB size/speed are major question marks, though, which need to be addressed if the 2023 defense is going to be able to compete well enough to win. There is also a question mark on whether the defense has playmakers to force turnovers and negative plays. There is a lot of work to do on this side of the ball.

Next up is the Organization.
 
Last edited:
on offense, if we can pull 1-2 p5 starters on the ol from the portal and a productive tight end, it would really be the difference. a qb would be awesome but i think unlikely.

on defense, we need a ton more speed and athleticism at lb. 1-2 p5 level transfer portal guys.

an edge dl would be a great pickup and 1 shutdown corner would be awesome.

if we get even half of that and don't lose anyone to the portal, i think we win 6... with pretty much any competent hc in place.
 
Good stuff!

If the incoming HC is going to be successful, here is my take on immediate needs:

Transfer Portal/JC
1 RB
3 OL
1 or 2 TE's
3 DL/Edge
2 LB's
CB

Recruiting (Top 35 class minimum the first year)
1 QB
1 RB
3 or 4 OL
1 TE
3 or 4 DL/Edge
2 LB
2 CB's
1 S
1 K

Not sure how many scholarships are available but with a new coach and system, I expect there to be significant attrition. If the coach has any chance at success, he will need to hit the portal hard and have success with transfers and JC players. Saban couldn't get the proposed 2023 roster to a bowl game without significant incoming transfers.
 
Part III - Organization

This might be the most important thing for a new HC to come in with eyes wide open, a plan for improving things, and the administrative support to make it happen. Some things are in good shape and may only need minor adjustments. Other things seem like they're major issues which hold CU Football back from winning. A lot of these areas are being brought up by CU boosters and while some are not problems, I think most CU observers would agree that a complete audit of the football program is in order after the failures over the past 15+ years.

Off-Field Staff

While there is a hard limit from the NCAA for on-field assistant coaches (10), there is no limit to off-field staff. These are the operations administrators, analysts, and recruiting personnel. This would also include Strength & Conditioning, Nutrition, Medical, Academic Support, and Psychological Support staff.

Analysts, Quality Control & Graduate Assistants

In general, CU has had positions filled with QC and GA guys to give us enough help here. The challenge is mostly budget, as we don't see veteran coaches in QC jobs and we haven't been willing to pay for experienced Analysts who are doing a rehab or pre-retirement year or two at a P5 program. This is definitely a place which could use some budget allocations and expansion to the football staff.

Recruiting Staff + Academic Support

This is where CU seems to fall short. Especially in consideration of having a program location which cannot live off local talent, there is a huge need to organize scouting, geo-targeting, and also to make sure that when recruits are brought to campus that the experience is top notch. As a comparison, Oregon also doesn't have a lot of local talent in its home state or, particularly, in the Eugene area. They have 5 Director level positions for Player Personnel/Recruiting, Scouting, Recruiting Operations, Recruiting Strategy, and On-Campus Recruiting. CU has 1 Director level position (Chandler Dorrell for Player Personnel), with 4 Assistant Directors and then a few Recruiting Assistants. This is a significant improvement at CU, but is lacking the budget for experienced professionals at the top of the org chart. Probably a spot where re-allocating the budget spent on Bob Lopez to be a General Manager (Dorrell's hand-picked "Assistant AD for Football") into a high level Director of Recruiting to go with a new Director of Player Personnel would be the move to make. A more tech-savvy approach to recruiting with data analytics personnel would be another area for improvement. Last, something FHCMT tried to bring CU up to where other programs are was with elevating our on-campus recruiting with more hosts and involvement of student with this program - something that should not have been cut, but needs to be done in a way that fits CU culture.

I rolled Academic Support under this header since transcript review is vital to recruiting, especially with the new transfer portal rules. We've actually got a 16-member staff here with some high level positions within the AD. This is, though, an area which needs more attention and focus to support the football program with dedicated football strategy and support. Results have been strong overall, with almost no academic eligibility problems or problems with academic progress/ graduation rate in recent years. CU's doing a good job with players in the program. The area for improvement is more about getting transfers into CU.

Strength & Conditioning Staff

At one time, it was frustrating to look at CU versus other P5 programs and see that we had 1 guy for football while others had a team of coaches. Now, CU has built out what it needs to be successful. We have Shannon Turley as Director of Strength & Conditioning (a position he held at Stanford), with 4 Assistant S&C Coaches under him who are involved with the football program. Maybe we could use a bit more FB dedication from the assistants and a greater emphasis on speed (some schools have a dedicated speed/agility coach). But this is an area where CU has improved and has enough to be successful now.

Nutrition, Sports Medicine & Psychological Health

There has been a lot of attention in social media lately on nutrition planning and training table options for the football team. Personally, I think this has been seriously overblown. CU football could use a dedicated Director with an assistant or two in order to manage the 100+ athletes in that program in order to not only design individual nutrition plans but also to monitor them and make sure they are following the plans. And, of course, menus should be constantly evaluated to make sure the athletes like the food - so menu tweaks should be a regular thing. However, when you look at staffing it's certainly a place where CU has invested and improved. We've got an Associate AD for Performance Nutrition, a Head Dietician & Culinary Educator, 2 Assistant Dieticians, an Executive Chef, 2 Sous Chefs, a Head Line Cook, and a Head Dining Attendant with 3 Assistants. While anything and everything needs to be evaluated and improved, this is not a significant problem.

With Sports Medicine, CU is in good shape and maybe even a leader. We've got an MD as our Director of Sports Medicine, a Sr. Associate AD for Health & Performance, a Head Athletic Trainer for FB, an Associate & 2 Assistant Athletic Trainers for FB, and a bunch of Team Physicians, including an Optometrist and Dentist. For injury prevention and recovery, CU is very solid. On top of that, CU makes a bigger commitment to mental health than most programs. Not only do we have Lance Carl as Director of Player Development and Brian Cabral as Character Coach, but we've got a Director of Psychological Health & Performance with 3 Assistant Directors. Could always use more and better, but CU is pretty strong in this area which also includes Diversity professionals and suicide prevention.

Facilities & Atmosphere

Any new HC is going to demand that CU has the facilities needed to compete against peers for recruits, player development and player health. These are areas where CU has made significant improvements in recent years.

For practice facilities, the Champions Center took things to a new level. Modern locker room, indoor practice facility, outdoor practice facility all connected to a modern weight room and training/rehab. Also on site, which distinguishes CU, is a UC Health medical center which allows for medical response to injuries within the same complex. Beyond that, there are also the outdoor practice fields and indoor bubble north of the football facilities across Boulder Creek. This is all a positive for CU football when compared to most peers.

For gameday facilities, Folsom Field is a pretty impressive environment. Scoreboards are recently upgraded and the sound system should be a fully modern system for 2023. The tradition of Ralphie running is probably the best in the nation. Chip is one of the better mascots. Other spirit squads like Band, Cheer and Dance need more investment, resources and attention. Some other traditions like the Buff Walk and Pearl Street Stampede could be ramped up to be more impressive to recruits and engaging with fans. Tailgating/ donor lots have seen increased services but there's work to do on parking and overall environment. There is also some work to do to improve Folsom and, more importantly, ticket marketing to increase revenue potential from the facility, draw a full house, and draw a full student section on full blast. A dream scenario would be a renovation of Folsom Field to make it louder, more appealing to casual fans, and (if possible) get to a point where expansion could be justified to over 60k (Wisconsin's stadium projects under Alvarez are a good template). One place to start which is a huge deal to students and most fans is having great Wi-Fi in the stadium and tailgating lots.

NIL Program, Media & Alumni/Donor Relations

Something which has always plagued CU has been the lack of a donor culture. There is so much which needs to be done here. Working with Buff Club chapters and helping get new ones established around the state of Colorado and nationally, offering incentives and staying in communication with young alums, doing more in schools and communities around the state, working with businesses to at least make sure they put up a CU sticker in their window, increasing advertising and sponsorships, building out Tier 3 media, increased marketing and PR efforts, reaching out to CU students and faculty on other campuses, increasing bandwidth for the ticket office and donor relations groups so that they can give more attention to medium & small donors, season ticket holders (or potential or former season ticket buyers), and businesses/ community groups. Etc., etc. The new HC needs to push and support these efforts by being very engaged with the CU community.

On NIL, CU is behind with challenges to making up ground. Much of this ties in to the lackluster donor culture and minimal CU football brand outreach. But it goes beyond those challenges. CU has not been aggressive. Rather, it has seemed more that CU is bothered by the new reality of NIL and instead of embracing what is, CU has decided to be resistant and behave based on what CU thinks NIL should be. Pushing the AD to drive the formation of cooperatives and collectives with CU boosters might be the most important thing the new HC can emphasize as organization support he needs from the Athletic Director.

Administrative Support

Saving the best for last. The AD needs more budget. The football program needs more emphasis. The facilities and organization need to always be improving. That's all of the above. But there are also changes to the actual academic & admissions rules which would make a dramatic impact on improving football results.

CU needs a General Studies major. Or, better stated, CU-Boulder needs the GS major. It already exists at CU-D. The lack of this means that the football program can hardly utilize the transfer portal to sign sophomores and juniors. Too few of their credits are direct transfers into CU majors (and there are some things to look at with CU having a culture of rejecting credits in order to make a buck off of the student having to take more credit hours at CU). As it stands, the NCAA requires progress toward a degree. Basically, that's a 5-year clock with the student-athlete needing to be 20% progressed toward a degree every year. When credits don't transfer to CU like they do even at academic heavyweights like Cal-Berkeley, it puts the Buffs football program in a position where freshmen can transfer here and be eligible (they've only taken the standard 100 level courses which are pretty much the same everywhere) or students who have already graduated can transfer here if they can get accepted into a Master's program (generally not an issue). This one fix would have a tremendous impact on CU's fortunes and has to happen.

**********************************

In short, a lot of CU is very appealing and well-done. Some minor areas for evaluation and improvement. Some big aspirational goals. But it's pretty much all there.

One of CU's biggest advantages also comes from the recruiting challenge of being a bit isolated from the talent epicenters. Unlike programs located in talent hot beds, there's a family closeness which develops at CU. Players, unlike those other places, don't go home on the weekends. They spend those weekends together with their teammates - their new family. That's a powerful thing which generally leads to CU being a bit better than the recruiting star ratings would say.

But that family atmosphere only works if the players feel like they have the best of everything and love it at CU. So it's vital that CU makes sure they get that experience.

Beyond that, it's 3 things which need to happen: NIL money for players, General Studies Major (transfer admissions), and Marketing/Promotion/Outreach to the various stakeholders.

All of this can happen. It should happen. What it will take is strong leadership and investment capital. The new HC can have a huge impact on this culture change.
 
Last edited:
The only thing I would add to this is the need to develop and encourage the connection to the program when students graduate.

Considering how bad we have been the level of student support has been impressive. I see the student section as a huge positive in recruiting and in the overall game environment. They generate a high level of positive energy in the stadium with a team on the field that frankly has often failed in that regard. They make attending games more fun for everyone.

The problem I see is that our graduates tend to spread to the winds after their time in Boulder. Outside of the students much of the crowd is older longtime fans. As these people age out who is going to replace them? The need is to keep the students engaged and attending past there times in Boulder.

These people are the future fans and future donors who will keep the program alive when the current older fans are gone. Keeping them coming to games, even if the revenue generated per seat isn't great will pay off in the future and go a long way towards your desire to have a consistently full stadium.
 
Dorrell was such a clown that it’s hard to know what we have.
I'd forgot about Jordyn Tyson till the ASU game. No reason that dude shouldn't have been playing more or getting more opportunity, unless he was hurt. That's one example, I've seen a few more.
 
Regarding transfers this year, the rules won't change quickly but that's sort of ok for this year.

We have 8 juniors becoming seniors (if everyone returns, which never happens).

So it's a great year to load up on grad transfers and fill that senior class on the roster.

The big question with the number of transfers we take is going to be on how much attrition we see. It's been held in check so far, but as players see another one of their coaches leave, lose their love of football, decide to move on with their adult lives, and/or have personal situations which makes transferring a better situation -- we will see an increase in the number of available scholarships we have within the 85 limit.

With no attrition, we're at 4 open scholarships and 16 graduating seniors. That's 20 spots available.

Normal attrition would push that to the 25-30 range. Unusual attrition (like seen with a coaching change & under the new "you get one free transfer" rule), that number could push to the range of 30-35.

There are some folks here who would like to see the new HC force attrition so that we're bringing in up to 45 new players this offseason.

That would be 25 signees and up to 20 transfers. It's do-able, but I wouldn't go that direction.

I think we should figure we'll end up in the 30-35 range. I'd target bringing in 10 transfers and 25 signees. That's heavy and relies on seeing significant attrition from the current roster, but the truth is that while I'm not really down on any of our players and do sincerely believe we have a solid core to this roster... I also believe that CU football needs a talent infusion. We need a lot more speed. We need to upgrade our ability to win the line of scrimmage.
 
The only thing I would add to this is the need to develop and encourage the connection to the program when students graduate.

Considering how bad we have been the level of student support has been impressive. I see the student section as a huge positive in recruiting and in the overall game environment. They generate a high level of positive energy in the stadium with a team on the field that frankly has often failed in that regard. They make attending games more fun for everyone.

The problem I see is that our graduates tend to spread to the winds after their time in Boulder. Outside of the students much of the crowd is older longtime fans. As these people age out who is going to replace them? The need is to keep the students engaged and attending past there times in Boulder.

These people are the future fans and future donors who will keep the program alive when the current older fans are gone. Keeping them coming to games, even if the revenue generated per seat isn't great will pay off in the future and go a long way towards your desire to have a consistently full stadium.
I mentioned it in the NIL section, but it definitely deserves more emphasis. That's the foundation of creating a sustainable donor culture. It also fills the cheap seats at Folsom.
 
Screen_Shot_2020-07-24_at_11.33.38_AM.jpg




Jk, great write up
 


I was thinking about facilities, and checked in on OSU's upgrades, as I remembered they were doing something.

Look how flippin' well done this video is, in terms of 1) sourcing cool, historic film and pictures and 2) pitching a stadium reno to a community at large, rather than football fans. Can't recall anything like this from CU.

I don't recall ever seeing something from CU that captured, in that way, just how much the program has meant to so many people through the years.
 
Back
Top