Unleash Hell
Well-Known Member
Beating Nebraska 62-36 or winning the Big 12 the next week?
So! With the 62-36 game behind us and the hardware in the trophy case, and with it being about 36 hours before the dawn of a new era for Colorado (and for Nebraska too).
The question is: What is better?
1. Beating USC or Oregon by a similar 62-36 score.
OR
2. Taking home the Pac 12 Conference championship trophy.
One way or another the 62-36 game and the trophy the came along that season will fade into distannt memory and become a blip on the radar screen.
Good Luck in the 12-Pac!
So! With the 62-36 game behind us and the hardware in the trophy case, and with it being about 36 hours before the dawn of a new era for Colorado (and for Nebraska too).
The question is: What is better?
1. Beating USC or Oregon by a similar 62-36 score.
OR
2. Taking home the Pac 12 Conference championship trophy.
One way or another the 62-36 game and the trophy the came along that season will fade into distannt memory and become a blip on the radar screen.
Good Luck in the 12-Pac!
One way or another the 62-36 game and the trophy the came along that season will fade into distannt memory and become a blip on the radar screen.
I'm going to go with beating the hell out of Nebraska in the Rose Bowl. Final answer.So! With the 62-36 game behind us and the hardware in the trophy case, and with it being about 36 hours before the dawn of a new era for Colorado (and for Nebraska too).The question is: What is better?1. Beating USC or Oregon by a similar 62-36 score.OR2. Taking home the Pac 12 Conference championship trophy.One way or another the 62-36 game and the trophy the came along that season will fade into distannt memory and become a blip on the radar screen.Good Luck in the 12-Pac!
Right now, I'd have to say that - without question - the Pac-12 Championship would mean more.So! With the 62-36 game behind us and the hardware in the trophy case, and with it being about 36 hours before the dawn of a new era for Colorado (and for Nebraska too).
The question is: What is better?
1. Beating USC or Oregon by a similar 62-36 score.
OR
2. Taking home the Pac 12 Conference championship trophy.
One way or another the 62-36 game and the trophy the came along that season will fade into distannt memory and become a blip on the radar screen.
Good Luck in the 12-Pac!
I went to both games as well and as fun as it was to bet the bugeaters, shocking the state of Texas was even more sweet. The place was easily 82-20 Texas fans versus CU fans. They picked a nice neutral site in the other teams home state that was a short drive to the stadium.
Very true but I called it a year in advance, I told my son's mom they were gonna beat them and big. She hates me but even her mean ass would admit that. Won 400 including the Texas game, lol was my brother pissed.The Nebraska game was like losing your virginity and the Texas game was like sleeping with Jessica Alba....
Both of which Liver has yet to achieve.... I am rooting for ya bro!
I was at both games. There was a real difference in "feel" to each of them. 62-36 was the culmination of a decade of frustration and heartache. From 1992-2000, CU had come tantalizingly close to beating the fuskers several times. 93, 94, 98, 99, 00 - all could have easily gone our way, but none did. Along comes 2001, and it seemed like there was nothing that was going to stop CU that day.
I was worried there would be a big let-down the following week in Dallas. I have to admit, it was a lot of fun watching CU put it to the whorns in Texas Stadium.
As for which was better - I give an ever so slight lean to the CCG against UT. It meant more. There was something tangible on the line, whereas the fusker game was really only for a spot in the championship game.
Allbuffs math right thereThe place was easily 82-20 Texas fans versus CU fans.
I went to both games as well and as fun as it was to bet the bugeaters, shocking the state of Texas was even more sweet. The place was easily 82-20 Texas fans versus CU fans. They picked a nice neutral site in the other teams home state that was a short drive to the stadium.
I went to both games as well and as fun as it was to bet the bugeaters, shocking the state of Texas was even more sweet. The place was easily 82-20 Texas fans versus CU fans. They picked a nice neutral site in the other teams home state that was a short drive to the stadium.
I was at both games. There was a real difference in "feel" to each of them. 62-36 was the culmination of a decade of frustration and heartache. From 1992-2000, CU had come tantalizingly close to beating the fuskers several times. 93, 94, 98, 99, 00 - all could have easily gone our way, but none did. Along comes 2001, and it seemed like there was nothing that was going to stop CU that day.
I was worried there would be a big let-down the following week in Dallas. I have to admit, it was a lot of fun watching CU put it to the whorns in Texas Stadium.
As for which was better - I give an ever so slight lean to the CCG against UT. It meant more. There was something tangible on the line, whereas the fusker game was really only for a spot in the championship game.
Beating texas was better because of the hardware and seeing the faces of billy bob and jethro was even better.
I don't know what is worse my typing or your mathWhere's the other 8 percent?