Curious what people think is more important. There was a very vocal contingent that said recruiting could be turned around with the right assistant coaches, others said it would take off with new facilities, and still others said it would take winning some games.
On the assistant coach theory: there was a noticeable tick up in recruiting with the addition of Leavitt and Tumpkin, before the facilities were completed, and then it exploded with the addition of Chev to the staff (and I will throw some credit to Hagen getting back out there on the recertuiting trail).
But that explosion also coincided with facility completion.
Finally, some Debbie Downers are going to say it will all fall apart if we don't win X number of games this year.
My sincere hope is that we do win enough games to be bowl eligible, and everyone can congratulate themselves for being right.
But I still think the most part of the puzzle is having the right recruiters on the staff.
On the assistant coach theory: there was a noticeable tick up in recruiting with the addition of Leavitt and Tumpkin, before the facilities were completed, and then it exploded with the addition of Chev to the staff (and I will throw some credit to Hagen getting back out there on the recertuiting trail).
But that explosion also coincided with facility completion.
Finally, some Debbie Downers are going to say it will all fall apart if we don't win X number of games this year.
My sincere hope is that we do win enough games to be bowl eligible, and everyone can congratulate themselves for being right.
But I still think the most part of the puzzle is having the right recruiters on the staff.