SIAP, but I don’t see anything about who our next name is against and where it will be played. When is that decided?
Suppose to be the second place team in the north which is Oregon. However, if Washington can't play in the Pac 12 championship (which is very likely) then Oregon would move in and CU would play the winner of Stanford/Oregon State. I thinkSIAP, but I don’t see anything about who our next name is against and where it will be played. When is that decided?
I think it will be in LA. They need the 2nd place teams to be on site in case there's a Covid problem with the first place teams.SIAP, but I don’t see anything about who our next name is against and where it will be played. When is that decided?
Lol. Was thinking this was a possibilityRammies
In the event USC can’t play, we would step in and play UWWhy do we have to go to LA?
In case of CCG covid issues. Teams on site.Why do we have to go to LA?
Valid explanation and considering our crappy field conditions. Would be great to play at SOFIIn case of CCG covid issues. Teams on site.
I believe so, which would suck, but would also keep us at 4-1 and a top winning percentage to assure a bowl gameWhat happens if Oregon plays for Washington if they have issues? We don't play?
The more likely outcome is that UW can't go and Oregon plays USC while we traveled to LA for no reason.In the event USC can’t play, we would step in and play UW
Valid explanation and considering our crappy field conditions. Would be great to play at SOFI
If that were to happen, CU should be awarded a victory by forfeit.Guessing we do not play.
He’s not an asshole, he’s just stating the obvious. Just like anyone objectively looking at UCLA and how since half time of the CU game in week one, they’ve easily been the best/second best team in the conference. You confident CU beats them if they play now?Wilner is such an ***hole. He tweets that the Buffs are undeserving of their victory against Stanford because Mills didn't get enough practice time and the game was "close". Maybe he should say that Utah is undeserving of their win against of the Buffs because of Landman's actual absence. Or that USC is undeserving of any of their close wins, including dumpster fire UA. In the same breath he seems to be campaigning to just name USC the champions to avoid any risk of loss and hurting USC's bowl. What the actual **** is this kind of ****? Lose 1 game under tough circumstances and suddenly it was all a fraud? And now the Buffs only role is to sit in the locker room in case USC can't play, because we already know that UW won't? WTF?
Meh, I hate the revisionist history, “what if” bull****. We played who we played and kicked most of their asses. We had a great year and it should be recognized as such. Retroactively trying to poke holes in it is bush league.He’s not an asshole, he’s just stating the obvious. Just like anyone objectively looking at UCLA and how since half time of the CU game in week one, they’ve easily been the best/second best team in the conference. You confident CU beats them if they play now?
CU possibly not having a game this weekend might be a blessing in disguise with CU’s current winning percentage getting them to a bowl game
I agree, I just don’t think his comments are all that malicious or out of line.Meh, I hate the revisionist history, “what if” bull****. We played who we played and kicked most of their asses. We had a great year and it should be recognized as such. Retroactively trying to poke holes in it is bush league.
To your second part. I’d like as many more games as possible. Selfishly, I love watching CU, but from a team standpoint I’d love to see the staff use whatever “bonus games” we get to play some freshman and/or depth pieces to see what we have for next year.
Play another P12 assume assuming second game cancelled. Line up B12 team starting today.What happens if Oregon plays for Washington if they have issues? We don't play?
That makes a differenceIf that were to happen, CU should be awarded a victory by forfeit.