Would this team have defended their honor better than the 05 squad against VY.

[TwoAdays]

If you factor in Hugh Charles, Darrell Scott's Uncle, and Direct snaps,


what would have been the score?

 

[GoldStampede]

56 17

W to Texas, of course.

 

[TwoAdays]

You'd also have to factor in Ladyblaise's homerism and the allbuffs taquito tailgaiting, and Scotch buff's beard.

 

[RalphieMalph]

Depends, if the CU team that played Oklahoma this year showed up, Texas probably would have won 42-35, or thereabouts. If the CU team that played Mizzou came out of the tunnel, the results probably would have been about the same.

But really, what's the point of this thread anyway? I mean, other than further proving that you're an ass...

 

[BeachBronco]

Doesn't matter, Texas was clearly the best team in the Big 12 by far and the best team in the nation, yeah we got waxxed but other then USC everyone got waxxed. No shame in getting thumped by one of the best college players I have ever seen.

 

[Scotch]

You'd also have to factor in Ladyblaise's homerism and the allbuffs taquito tailgaiting, and Scotch buff's beard.

Uh, what?

 

[Bone Buff]

No, because VY was stating his Heisman case.

 

[66BUFF]

Uh, what?

ignore 82adays he is a confused CUunt

 

[CUBUFF80]

Talk about irrelevant.

 

[JimmyBuff]

Talk about irrelevant.

Yeah, who the **** cares what happened in 2005..

The program was at rock bottom after that game with a coach that was checked out already..... We aren't at rock bottom after the Missouri game.. Missouri pounded us, we didn't play well and now we move on.. I don't get the correlation between the two games..

 

[TwoAdays]

No need for correlation. Just wondered if this team is actually an improvement from the 05 squad. Simple questions.

Does 70-3 really still hurt all that bad?

I mean if it doesn't, no need for thinking one's an ass for asking.

 

[JimmyBuff]

No need for correlation. Just wondered if this team is actually an improvement from the 05 squad. Simple questions.

Does 70-3 really still hurt all that bad?

I mean if it doesn't, no need for thinking one's an ass for asking.

Yes, its an improvement over the 2005 team.. I think there's more younger talent on the team.. 2005 team had a lot of upperclassmen that played a big part in that season.. We are starting 2 FR OL, RS FR QB, FR WR... Team is completely different..

30-3 and then 70-3 felt much worse than last week's Missouri loss..

 

[TwoAdays]

Yes, its an improvement over the 2005 team.. I think there's more younger talent on the team.. 2005 team had a lot of upperclassmen that played a big part in that season.. We are starting 2 FR OL, RS FR QB, FR WR... Team is completely different..

30-3 and then 70-3 felt much worse than last week's Missouri loss..

Would have comparing the 05 squad against the 07 Tigers be valid too?

I just don't want to offend any sunshine pumpers.

 

[DustyRhodes]

You'd also have to factor in Ladyblaise's homerism and the allbuffs taquito tailgaiting, and Scotch buff's beard.

she probably thinks that CU could give the Pats a run for their money.

 

[TwoAdays]

she thinks that CU could give the Pats a run for their money.

fixed.

 

[TwoAdays]

she probably thinks that CU could give the Pats a run for their money.

I hate to say it. but you sir DustyChodes is one of the most down to earth fans here. You call it like it is.

Don't take it as an endorsement. You're still a hussie after all.

 

[absinthe]

If you factor in Hugh Charles, Darrell Scott's Uncle, and Direct snaps,


what would have been the score?

I think Texas wins the game easy but I don't think they roll over and play dead barney's team quit after the NU game, and while this team has less time in the system and talent I cant see a Hawkins team quiting like that.