Sexton Hardcastle
Club Member
Do you think Dan Hawkins is leading CU in the right direction?
Yeh? :thumbsup:
Neh?:sad1:
Yeh? :thumbsup:
Neh?:sad1:
Do you think Dan Hawkins is leading CU in the right direction?
Yeh? :thumbsup:
Neh?:sad1:
I think we are headed in the right direction, for now. However, and I know this could bold and nearsighted to say, but Cody could be the undoing of his father. He is a decent QB, but he is not good and definitely not great. His father won't bench him and we are stuck with him for the next two and a half seasons. By the time he leaves, his Dad might not have the momentum he needs to continue to build the program.
How can you say no? Hawk improved to a bowl after 2-10, he is off to a 3-1 start this year and he is competitive against almost anyone.
You bet we are headed in the right direction and anybody who can't recognize it truly does not know anything about footballk, recruting and the facts.
Very cool avatar. :thumbsup:
I do see your point. But don't you think its a little too early to say if Cody isn't any good? I mean, he's only a sophmore. True he doesn't have a cannon on his shoulder, and he's short. I'm just not ready to stick a fork in him just yet. jmho here.
This is due more to a couple down programs (Mizzou, KU esp) finding hidden gems in recruiting at the QB position at the same time as fielding some decent defensive talent. Mizzou (after this year) and KU (perhaps this year, but definitely after Reesing leaves) will BOTH be back down in mediocrity soon. Pinkel was a .500 coach before finding a certain short QB/heisman candidate/robot superstar, and he will be again.Headed in the right direction? Depends on where the start point is based.
Compared to the past 6 seasons? Yep. The direction is correct.
It'd be nice if the speed in which Colorado gets to the top of the B12 might be a little faster.
The Big 12 has gotten really good really fast.
This is due more to a couple down programs (Mizzou, KU esp) finding hidden gems in recruiting at the QB position at the same time as fielding some decent defensive talent. Mizzou (after this year) and KU (perhaps this year, but definitely after Reesing leaves) will BOTH be back down in mediocrity soon. Pinkel was a .500 coach before finding a certain short QB/heisman candidate/robot superstar, and he will be again.
Not sure at this point. Problem is,with so many i njuries and especially the OL,I think that will cost cu big time this season.
Miller and tuioti out is brutal.
I was hoping for 7 wins, I doubt it but we'll see,that's why you play the games.
If they are not going to use darrell scott,they should have redshirted him.5 carries isn't going to cut it. I mean is that how they are going to use him the next 8 games,5 carries? If so, don't be suprised if he.....
i think the reason hawk has not replaced cody is because we do not have a better option at this point.
i fail to see how that will really undo either of them.
Is the program headed in the right direction? yes. No question. Colorado is being talked about, we are competing for the kids with USC, UT, OU, ND, etc, not New Mexico State and Idaho. We are faster than we have been in a long time, and will continue to get that way in the future.
Now we did start to think we were further ahead than we were-- think about how CU's win/loss total would be if we had 18 kids suspended for the first 3 games. FSU was better with so many starters back. So we didn't beat them on the road. I can't imagine we will see a better and faster defense than we did last week for the rest of the year.
I also think that Cody will NOT be the starter his senior year, and will be at worse, sharing time next year with Hansen. Hansen just could not come in and know the offense as well as Cody when he was a true frshman, but from all I have heard, is making great strides this year. I also take into account that the backup QB's are the favortie people on the team, so we will see. I do not think that hawk makes the Helfrich play Cody if Hansen is a better player.