Today we are finally in the Rivals recruiting top 50. Cant wait to see how high we climb.
Today we are finally in the Rivals recruiting top 50. Cant wait to see how high we climb.
Where do you think we finish? Is finishing the Rivals rating at 25 - 30 out of the question?
In your opinion, you think we're pretty well out of the running with him?...... Our best chance on that is Aziz ****tu, although he hasn't mentioned us in a while.
In your opinion, you think we're pretty well out of the running with him?
how are we behind ucla? we have a higher average, 2 more commits and the same amount of 4 stars(1) and more 3 stars
I think if Matt Cochran (hs teammate) is still high on us and decides to visit that we get back in the running with ****tu. Otherwise, I think he ends up back at Stanford.
****tu is going to end up at Cal.
I suppose their formula looks at standard position and #'s in classes (i.e., 2 sr wr's). If so, it's very generic and prolly doesn't look at the type of offense/defense run by the respective schools.Their formula isn't that simple, it takes need into account. For example, you could sign the top 25 OL in the country, which would gather a bunch of 5 and 4 star with the rest 3 star, but your class would be lower rated because you didn't address all of your needs.
Frankly, if we end up somewhere in the 40's once it's all said and done, I'd be very pleased.
:stupid: HaLk has really ****ed our expectations up.It is not only realistic to end up in the low 30s, it should be the expectation.
What did our recruiting classes rank under GB?
I'd rather not mimic the Barnett era.