I'm just anxious for signing day now... GET HERE QUICK.
I'm just anxious for signing day now... GET HERE QUICK.
Scott will get time as a 4 and eventually at the 3
6'9" 240ish is big for a 3 and at the moment we dont have anyone to move him over, what sort of line-up do you think we run where we'd see Josh at the 3?
Scott will get time as a 4 and eventually at the 3
Thanks for stopping by and offering some insight. I know you just scouted him in person in Vegas for BuffScoop, so when you say the "3" at times for him, I'm guessing you saw more of a face-up game and lateral agility than we were expecting?
Really going to be tough to defend us if we're able to play guys like Scott and Cain at the 3 without sacrificing our offensive system.
Thanks for stopping by and offering some insight. I know you just scouted him in person in Vegas for BuffScoop, so when you say the "3" at times for him, I'm guessing you saw more of a face-up game and lateral agility than we were expecting?
Really going to be tough to defend us if we're able to play guys like Scott and Cain at the 3 without sacrificing our offensive system.
Cain at the three spot?? See to me, he has 4 all over him, and if he beefs up, then he could even play undersized 5 (typical 4 disguised as a 5)...
Josh Scott will not be a small forward. He is not a C but he is a good sized PF at the next level.
He's been quoted saying as much.
-----------Sounds to me like he is going to be a badass no matter where we put him
-----------
You are right. I think the point is you want your best rebounders and post scorers in the paint, with room to operate.
He is not a 3 in any way.
According to this ESPN blog, he is a center... They rank him as one of the most fundamental and best rebounding centers. But he will be a PF in the Pac 12.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/blog?name=telep_dave&id=6877344
Again, he is not a 3 right now. But all his skill work that he's been doing has been geared towards becoming a guy who can swing to that position depending on match ups. So yes, the coaches will be looking at him as a 3 down the line.
Just from a common sense perspective...
If he is working on his perimeter skills, it would make more sense to have him at the 4/5 where he could use that to his advantage on same sized guys or bigger guys, wouldn't it? That would be an advantage. Is a 6'9" dude really going to take a 6'6" guy off the dribble, or come off screens shooting 3's? Plus, he would have to chase a much smaller guy around the 3 pt. line on defense... It makes no sense. He is surely working to become a more complete player but I seriously doubt he will ever be on the perimeter as a wing, regardless of match ups.
Per Adam, he's #66 in the Rivals 150 now.
Edit -- and now Rivals becomes the final service to finally give him a 4* ranking.