BuffNut99
Club Member
Agreed. Pretty sure that's what Embree would have done at 11:59pm Wed.Iowa should pull the offer now. Of course, it's pretty easy for us to sit here and say that.
Agreed. Pretty sure that's what Embree would have done at 11:59pm Wed.Iowa should pull the offer now. Of course, it's pretty easy for us to sit here and say that.
I'll tell you what's bull****: complaining about a HS kid who's making a big decision but not complying with an arbitrary day, set up to satisfy multi-million dollar businesses. And Iowa is free to do what they want - it's not like he has nothing at risk.
IMO, this is a non-story it has nothihg on a major recruiter jumping to a conference rival just before signing day. And why the hell do you care, anyway? We're not in the picture.
And with that a year worth of coaches and parents pulling him in different directions.Dude, he's had a whole year to decide.
And with that a year worth of coaches and parents pulling him in different directions.
**** the establishment! :lol:I'll tell you what's bull****: complaining about a HS kid who's making a big decision but not complying with an arbitrary day, set up to satisfy multi-million dollar businesses. And Iowa is free to do what they want - it's not like he has nothing at risk.
IMO, this is a non-story it has nothihg on a major recruiter jumping to a conference rival just before signing day. And why the hell do you care, anyway? We're not in the picture.
I hope our coaches never accept players that decide to switch to the Buffs on or after signing day. That would be really wrong.
ExACTLY! :thumbsup:I hope our coaches never accept players that decide to switch to the Buffs on or after signing day. That would be really wrong.
My issue isn't with him wanting to go to Michigan. It's with his giving a verbal to Iowa and then not following through. If he wanted to go to Michigan, he shouldn't have given a verbal to Iowa. As somebody has stated - if Iowa told some kid that their class was full because of this jerk, I'd be pretty pissed off. He waited until the last possible minute to issue his verbal to Iowa. If Michigan was going to come calling, they would have done so already. Be a stand up guy and go to Iowa. Unless, of course, they've pulled the offer. That's what I'd do.
Iowa should yank the offer.
I'm jumping in late, so I don't know all the details. I have no issues with a kid giving a verbal just to hold on to a scholarship. College recruiting is a shady business, and there are plenty of examples of schools screwing over kids. Didn't Stanford just pull a kids offer because he didn't "qualify"? I believe the kid had better grades out of HS than Barry Sanders Jr. But that's just the most recent example. I'm sure there are thousands of examples of kids getting jerked around.
I'm jumping in late, so I don't know all the details. I have no issues with a kid giving a verbal just to hold on to a scholarship. College recruiting is a shady business, and there are plenty of examples of schools screwing over kids. Didn't Stanford just pull a kids offer because he didn't "qualify"? I believe the kid had better grades out of HS than Barry Sanders Jr. But that's just the most recent example. I'm sure there are thousands of examples of kids getting jerked around.
So two wrongs make a right. No justification for what SEC schools do with oversigning or Stanford pulling a kid's scholly for "academic" reasons. That doesn't mean that Iowa lied to this kid or deserved for him to be a jerk.
Certainly recruiting can be a dirty business and if it were Bama' involved then you could look at it differently but there is no sign that Iowa did anything that was not up-front and honest. I hope that Iowa pulls the scholly and the kid gets left scrambling for a spot. He will find one but if it isn't one that he would have preferred, so much the better.
Neither is OK. I don't like what Stanford did either. I think they did it to a couple kids, IIRC. Bad form, if you ask me. However, at least Stanford had the class to pull the offer prior to NLOI day. Each of those kids had the opportunity to go elsewhere, and one of them nearly came here.
The Kozan situation smells a lot to me like a kid with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement. He doesn't think he should play by the same rules as everybody else.
So I don't really buy your "two wrongs don't make a right" line.
At least they pulled it before NLOI day? Wow. Not going there. :lol:
So two wrongs DO make a right?
Neither is OK. I don't like what Stanford did either. I think they did it to a couple kids, IIRC. Bad form, if you ask me. However, at least Stanford had the class to pull the offer prior to NLOI day. Each of those kids had the opportunity to go elsewhere, and one of them nearly came here.
The Kozan situation smells a lot to me like a kid with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement. He doesn't think he should play by the same rules as everybody else.
Would you have preferred to have them accept the LOI and THEN tell him he can't get in to school? Wow. I'm not going there, either.
"Class" was an innappropriate choice of words for what Stanford did. I just couldn't think of a better word. I believe that they did the kids a favor by not accepting the LOIs. A lot of schools wouldn't have done that. They would have accepted the LOI and kicked the can down the road, hoping for some natural attrition.
:lol: Yeah. Thanks Stanford. :lol:
Again. I have no issues with a kid using a school to get ahead.
So you expect the school to behave appropriately but whatever the kid does is okay because he is a kid. Glad I'm not coaching your kid, ticket to a losing program.
Yeah, a week. That was classy.
Regarding Kozan, how is everyone so sure he didn't tell Iowa he was committing unless Michigan showed up with an offer? Even if he didn't, I still side with the kids. The schools can and do **** the student athletes around after they are in the program, so the kids need to do what they have to do.