General question here. In the Rivals ranking, what does "5.5rr" mean? I know that the higher the better. Right?
Nate Solder was 5.6 per Rivals in 2006. A solid middle of the road 3* kind of guy.
Bakhtiari had a 5.3 rating which may him a middle of the road 2* guy.How about Bahktiari? He wasn't even that high=2*; he was a better LAX player than FB player in HS.
Cool. Thanks.5.5 is the low end 3* rating.
2* - 5.2, 5.3, 5.4
3* - 5.5, 5.6, 5.7
4* - 5.8, 5.9, 6.0
5* - 6.1
The only way that I look at recruiting is to a) look at the level of a kid's competition, and even more so, b) look at who else has offered him. The "stars" stuff is an add-on, but way back in the distance. The current CU roster is populated with lots of guys who didn't have big-time offers. It's telling.
:lol:I don't think that word means what you think it means.
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
Nate Solder was 5.6 per Rivals in 2006. A solid middle of the road 3* kind of guy.
A plethora? Jefe, what is a plethora?And what about the plethora of 2* and 3* players CU has recruited over the past 5 years?
Thought so....
SemanticsBuffs. I shoulda said Onliest...
:rolling_eyes: Never saw "Three Amigos" I take it....plethora = way to frickin many
:rolling_eyes: Never saw "Three Amigos" I take it....
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
I agree, El Guapo...Movie got panned at the time it came out. Upon review, it was pretty damn brilliant.